Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 1 review
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro AT M vs Laufenn S fit EQ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison51Why this score
Source Dynapro AT M S fit EQ Professional tests (TWG score) – 49 Reviews found online – 54 -
–
Wet
No comparison50Why this score
Source Dynapro AT M S fit EQ Professional tests (TWG score) – 45 Reviews found online – 56 -
–
Comfort
No comparison63Why this score
Source Dynapro AT M S fit EQ Reviews found online – 56 -
–
Noise
No comparison56Why this score
Source Dynapro AT M S fit EQ Professional tests (TWG score) – 49 -
–
Treadwear
No comparison62Why this score
Source Dynapro AT M S fit EQ Professional tests (TWG score) – 64 Reviews found online – 59 -
–
Handling
No comparison49Why this score
Source Dynapro AT M S fit EQ Reviews found online – 49
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AT M | Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 54 |
| Dry | – | 51 |
| Wet | – | 50 |
| Comfort | – | 63 |
| Noise | – | 56 |
| Treadwear | – | 62 |
| Handling | – | 49 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Dynapro AT M
54
/ 100
S fit EQ
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro AT M
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B S fit EQ
Pros
- Attractive price point offering high value for money
- Low road noise resulting in a quiet, comfortable ride for daily commuting
- Competent dry grip and handling under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Flimsy sidewalls prone to bubbling and easy puncture from potholes
- Poor wet weather performance with tendencies toward understeer and traction loss
- Lack of steering feedback and poor turn-in response
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AT M | B · Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 27 | 24 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | 15″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro AT M
54
/ 100
Laufenn S fit EQ
Only Laufenn S fit EQ has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AT M
Tire B · Laufenn S fit EQ
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.