Tests – · 1 test Owners 63 · 19 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) vs Michelin Defender LTX M/S2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 19 + 3,699 owner reviews. How we score
Defender LTX M/S2 is ahead, 76–65
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 65 · 1 test Owners 88 · 3,699 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 30 in 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test (snow braking)
“The tires are over inflated for transport. The dealership should set them to the proper PSI during PDI but that's not always the case. I had 55 PSI in mine which explained the rough ride.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Defender LTX M/S2 +368Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 (RF11) Defender LTX M/S2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 52 Reviews found online 63 91 Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65
Defender LTX M/S2: 60% × 52 + 40% × 91.4 = 68
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
64
Wet
Defender LTX M/S2 +1377Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 (RF11) Defender LTX M/S2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 62 92 Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 64
Defender LTX M/S2: 60% × 66.8 + 40% × 91.7 = 77
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
63
Snow
Defender LTX M/S2 +1881Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 (RF11) Defender LTX M/S2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 58 77 Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 63
Defender LTX M/S2: 60% × 84 + 40% × 76.9 = 81
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
58
Comfort
Defender LTX M/S2 +2482Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 (RF11) Defender LTX M/S2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 53 88 Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 52.8 = 58
Defender LTX M/S2: 40% × 72.6 (est.) + 60% × 87.6 = 82
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Defender LTX M/S2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
65
Noise
Defender LTX M/S2 +1075Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 (RF11) Defender LTX M/S2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 64 89 Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65
Defender LTX M/S2: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 88.6 = 75
No road tests of noise for Dynapro AT2 (RF11) or Defender LTX M/S2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
Defender LTX M/S2 +1080Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 (RF11) Defender LTX M/S2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 71 ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 68 89 Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 67.8 = 70
Defender LTX M/S2: 60% × 74.6 (est.) + 40% × 89 = 80
No road tests of treadwear for Defender LTX M/S2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison87Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 (RF11) Defender LTX M/S2 Reviews found online – 87
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) | Michelin Defender LTX M/S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 76 |
| Dry | 65 | 68 |
| Wet | 64 | 77 |
| Snow | 63 | 81 |
| Comfort | 58 | 82 |
| Noise | 65 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 80 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Dynapro AT2 (RF11)
76
/ 100
Defender LTX M/S2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Dynapro AT2 (RF11) | Defender LTX M/S2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #12/18 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires | #3/30 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro AT2 (RF11)
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Defender LTX M/S2
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth highway ride
- Outstanding tread life and long-term durability
- Improves fuel economy and lowers rolling resistance
Cons
- High upfront purchase price
- Occasional difficulty with balancing and high-speed vibrations
- Can pick up small rocks and struggles in deep snow compared to dedicated winter tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11)
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Defender LTX M/S2
The community widely views the Michelin Defender LTX M/S2 as an outstanding highway and daily driving tire, praising its smooth ride, low road noise, and reliable wet traction. While considered an ideal replacement for noisy all-terrain or OEM tires, some users question its performance in severe winter or deep mud conditions compared to dedicated off-road tires. A few owners also raised minor concerns regarding warranty differences, balancing, and tread life compared to prior generations.
bobistheoilguy.com
·2 upvotes ·2025-01-22
“I got them on Sequoia. Almost slammed into the garage wall trying to climb my 8% driveway with 4WD engaged. I tried gently to climb, and the car started to go sideways. VikingContact7 will climb from a standstill on the driveway with no slip with just 2WD.”
r/f150
·2 upvotes ·2026-10-05
“2019 with 285/70r17. 1.5" spacer brought it up closer to 2". Rims were off a raptor. I think it looks good without looking like too much. Also went for defender ltx m/s2 as I dont need all terrains. Its a 4x4 and gets around just fine without them. Rides so smooth compared the stock 20" rims with smaller tires.”
forum.ih8mud.com
·1 upvote ·2024-12-03
“I get it, I used to run more “All Terrains” on the Tundra but went with the Michelin Defender LTX M/S2 more recently because they ride so not nice the 95%+ time I’m on the road.”
Top themes
#highway ride comfort#wet weather traction#low road noise#fuel and range efficiency#light snow performance#all-terrain comparison
Based on 83 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) | B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 46 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11 - 14/32″ |
| UTQG | 440 - 660 A A - B | 820 B A |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11)
76
/ 100
Michelin Defender LTX M/S2
Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S2 — better comfort, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Defender LTX M/S2 scores 82 vs 58 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin Defender LTX M/S2 scores 81 vs 63 on snow.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Defender LTX M/S2 scores 77 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Michelin Defender LTX M/S2 scores 75 vs 65 on noise.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11)
Tire B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro AT2 (RF11) or Defender LTX M/S2?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro AT2 (RF11) or Defender LTX M/S2?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S2, 77 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro AT2 (RF11) or Defender LTX M/S2?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S2, 68 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dynapro AT2 (RF11) or Defender LTX M/S2?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S2, 81 vs 63 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Dynapro AT2 (RF11) or Defender LTX M/S2?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S2, 75 vs 65 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro AT2 (RF11) or Defender LTX M/S2?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S2, 82 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro AT2 (RF11) or Defender LTX M/S2?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S2, 80 vs 70 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology