Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 241 + 222 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Dynapro AT2 Xtreme 74, Road Venture AT52 75.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 241 reviews
“New shoes on my ‘23 XSE Wanted to stick with black rims but saw these on an older gen and loved the look. Wrapped in 245/65R17 Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme‘s. Also replaced the OEM springs with Eibach lift springs for a bit more ride height.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 222 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Dynapro AT2 Xtreme | Road Venture AT52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 73 (est.) | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 80 |
Dynapro AT2 Xtreme: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 79 = 75
Road Venture AT52: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.6 = 76
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2 Xtreme. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Road Venture AT52. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 Xtreme | Road Venture AT52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 75 (est.) | ≈ 77 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 81 |
Dynapro AT2 Xtreme: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.8 = 77
Road Venture AT52: 60% × 76.6 (est.) + 40% × 81.4 = 79
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2 Xtreme. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Road Venture AT52. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 Xtreme | Road Venture AT52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 69 |
Road Venture AT52: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70
No road tests of snow for Road Venture AT52. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 Xtreme | Road Venture AT52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 72 |
Dynapro AT2 Xtreme: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70
Road Venture AT52: 40% × 69.6 (est.) + 60% × 71.6 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2 Xtreme or Road Venture AT52. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dynapro AT2 Xtreme | Road Venture AT52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 76 |
Dynapro AT2 Xtreme: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 70
Road Venture AT52: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 70
No road tests of noise for Dynapro AT2 Xtreme or Road Venture AT52. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dynapro AT2 Xtreme | Road Venture AT52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 77 |
Dynapro AT2 Xtreme: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 72
Road Venture AT52: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2 Xtreme. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Road Venture AT52. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 Xtreme | Road Venture AT52 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 72 | 72 |
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme | Kumho Road Venture AT52 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 75 |
| Dry | 75 | 76 |
| Wet | 77 | 79 |
| Snow | – | 70 |
| Comfort | 70 | 71 |
| Noise | 70 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro AT2 Xtreme
Road Venture AT52
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme is largely positive, with owners praising its sure-footed performance in snow and competent wet handling compared to competitors like the BFG KO2. Drivers also appreciate the aggressive appearance, softer ride quality, and competitive 70,000-mile treadwear warranty, though some note slight dry handling trade-offs due to aggressive tread lugs.
“New shoes on my ‘23 XSE Wanted to stick with black rims but saw these on an older gen and loved the look. Wrapped in 245/65R17 Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme‘s. Also replaced the OEM springs with Eibach lift springs for a bit more ride height.”
“Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme Finally change my old worn tires and saw a video on youtube from Engineering Explained about All Terrains and Hankook was the tire used as an example. I’m quite impressed by how these tires perform on wet roads even with how aggressive they are compared to other similarly aggressive all terrains like the BFGoodrich KO2 that I used to have. They also have a pretty good 70K mile warranty which is pretty great! Read more”
“I had the Dynapro AT2’s on my Lightning and they’re ok. I’d say they’re excellent dry, ok wet and in mud, marginal in snow. When I was looking for new tires I wanted an All Terrain that was slightly more aggressive for off-road and Three-Peak snow rated. But, with the Lightning, they couldn’t be a heavy tire as it would hurt range. Ended up settling on the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme. Essentially this is the newer version of the AT2. I’ve got about 10,000 miles on them so far and I’ll say dry handling is a little worse than the old AT2 (probably due to the more aggressive lugs), wet handling is about the same, but mud and snow handling is noticeably improved. So all in all, I probably wouldn’t get the AT2 again but I would do the AT2 Xtreme again.”
Based on 10 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme | B · Kumho Road Venture AT52 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 16 | 59 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 14″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 13.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 680 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 55,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 13 | 13 |
Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme
Kumho Road Venture AT52
Too close to call: Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme and Kumho Road Venture AT52 are within 2 points overall.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 79 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 76 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
