Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 vs Hankook Optimo H725 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 16 + 36 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro HP RA23 is ahead, 69–55

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Optimo H725
Tire BHankook

Optimo H725

All-Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Dynapro HP RA23 +17
    53
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP RA23Optimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7145

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 70

    Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Dynapro HP RA23 +13
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP RA23Optimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7052

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 70

    Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Dynapro HP RA23 +10
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP RA23Optimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6146

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP RA23 +17
    54
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP RA23Optimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7340

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 71

    Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP RA23 or Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    Dynapro HP RA23 +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP RA23Optimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6752

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67

    Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP RA23 or Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    Dynapro HP RA23 +12
    56
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP RA23Optimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7049

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 68

    Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HP RA23 +26
    46
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP RA23Optimo H725
    Reviews found online7246
Scores at a glance
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 vs Hankook Optimo H725: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro HP RA23Hankook Optimo H725
Relative Score 69 55
Dry 70 53
Wet 70 57
Snow 65 55
Comfort 71 54
Noise 67 61
Treadwear 68 56
Handling (owners) 72 46

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dynapro HP RA23

Optimo H725

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HP RA23

Pros

  • Exceptional tread wear and long lifespan
  • Whisper-quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Good overall grip and braking in dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Potential for sudden understeer in wet conditions during aggressive cornering
  • Mixed feedback regarding ride comfort from a small subset of users
  • Limited ice traction compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP RA23 review

Tire B Optimo H725

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 B · Hankook Optimo H725
CategorySummerAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—700 A B
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23

Hankook Optimo H725

Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 72 vs 46 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 70 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 71 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 70 vs 57 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP RA23
Tire B · Hankook Optimo H725

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HP RA23 or Optimo H725?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP RA23 or Optimo H725?

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 70 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP RA23 or Optimo H725?

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 70 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro HP RA23 or Optimo H725?

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 65 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Dynapro HP RA23 or Optimo H725?

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 67 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP RA23 or Optimo H725?

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 71 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP RA23 or Optimo H725?

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 68 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology