Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 26 + 16 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact LX25 leads, 73–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    CrossContact LX25 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Dynapro HP RA23
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8371

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.7 = 75

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 80

    Wet

    CrossContact LX25 +9
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Dynapro HP RA23
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 77 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8371

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 80

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 71

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Dynapro HP RA23 +12
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Dynapro HP RA23
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests40≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7261

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 53

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Dynapro HP RA23
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7972

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76

    Dynapro HP RA23: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 72.1 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 71

    Noise

    CrossContact LX25 +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Dynapro HP RA23
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7866

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 71

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 66

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25 or Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    CrossContact LX25 +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Dynapro HP RA23
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7672

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact LX25 +8
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Dynapro HP RA23
    Reviews found online7971
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Hankook Dynapro HP RA23: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Hankook Dynapro HP RA23
Relative Score 73 69
Dry 75 70
Wet 80 71
Snow 53 65
Comfort 76 71
Noise 71 66
Treadwear 72 70
Handling (owners) 79 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

± 8

Dynapro HP RA23

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B Dynapro HP RA23

Pros

  • Exceptional tread wear and long lifespan
  • Whisper-quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Good overall grip and braking in dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Potential for sudden understeer in wet conditions during aggressive cornering
  • Mixed feedback regarding ride comfort from a small subset of users
  • Limited ice traction compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP RA23 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Hankook Dynapro HP RA23
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available401
Rim diameters16″ – 22″16″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23

Narrow edge: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 if snow matters most to you. Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 65 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 75 vs 70 on dry.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP RA23

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or Dynapro HP RA23?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or Dynapro HP RA23?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or Dynapro HP RA23?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or Dynapro HP RA23?

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 65 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or Dynapro HP RA23?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 66 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or Dynapro HP RA23?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 71 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or Dynapro HP RA23?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology