Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro HP vs Laufenn S FIT AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 7 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Dynapro HP and S FIT AS are level at 64.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
S FIT AS +264Why this score
Source Dynapro HP S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 59 62 Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
S FIT AS: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 64
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
Dynapro HP +662Why this score
Source Dynapro HP S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 67 59 Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
S FIT AS: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 62
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison52Why this score
Source Dynapro HP S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online – 40 S FIT AS: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.5 = 52
No road tests of snow for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
S FIT AS +166Why this score
Source Dynapro HP S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 61 63 Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65
S FIT AS: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP or S FIT AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison65Why this score
Source Dynapro HP S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 62 S FIT AS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 65
No road tests of noise for S FIT AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
S FIT AS +469Why this score
Source Dynapro HP S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 65 61 Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
S FIT AS: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 61.2 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
57
Handling (owners)
S FIT AS +461Why this score
Source Dynapro HP S FIT AS Reviews found online 57 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP | Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 64 |
| Dry | 62 | 64 |
| Wet | 68 | 62 |
| Snow | – | 52 |
| Comfort | 65 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
Dynapro HP
64
/ 100
S FIT AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP
Pros
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
- Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
- Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)
Cons
- Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
- Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
- Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
Tire B S FIT AS
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good grip and handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
- Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
- Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP | B · Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 14 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro HP
64
/ 100
Laufenn S FIT AS
Too close to call: Hankook Dynapro HP and Laufenn S FIT AS are within 2 points overall. Hankook Dynapro HP is stronger on wet. Laufenn S FIT AS is stronger on treadwear. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Laufenn S FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Dynapro HP scores 68 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP
Tire B · Laufenn S FIT AS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP or S FIT AS?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP or S FIT AS?
Hankook Dynapro HP, 68 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP or S FIT AS?
Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 64 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP or S FIT AS?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP or S FIT AS?
Laufenn S FIT AS, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology