Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews
Hankook Dynapro HP vs Michelin CrossClimate — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 7 + 152 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate is ahead, 74–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 2 tests Owners 72 · 152 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 14 in 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
CrossClimate +1476Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 59 73 Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
CrossClimate: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 72.6 = 76
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
CrossClimate +775Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 67 76 Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
CrossClimate: 60% × 75.1 + 40% × 75.7 = 75
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison68Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 71 Reviews found online – 64 CrossClimate: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 64 = 68
-
65
Comfort
CrossClimate +772Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 61 75 Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65
CrossClimate: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP or CrossClimate. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) CrossClimate: 60% × 70.7 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 69
No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
65
Treadwear
CrossClimate +772Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 65 71 Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
CrossClimate: 60% × 73 + 40% × 70.9 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
57
Handling (owners)
CrossClimate +1572Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CrossClimate Reviews found online 57 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP | Michelin CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 74 |
| Dry | 62 | 76 |
| Wet | 68 | 75 |
| Snow | – | 68 |
| Comfort | 65 | 72 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro HP
CrossClimate
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP
Pros
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
- Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
- Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)
Cons
- Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
- Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
- Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
Tire B CrossClimate
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Strong wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
- Reliable traction in light snow and cold conditions
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and retain small stones in the tread pattern
- Noticeable drop in performance as tread depth decreases
- Potential for reduced fuel economy compared to dedicated summer tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP | B · Michelin CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 14 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro HP
Michelin CrossClimate
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin CrossClimate scores 72 vs 57 on handling.
Michelin CrossClimate scores 76 vs 62 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate scores 75 vs 68 on wet.
Michelin CrossClimate scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP or CrossClimate?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP or CrossClimate?
Michelin CrossClimate, 75 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP or CrossClimate?
Michelin CrossClimate, 76 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP or CrossClimate?
Michelin CrossClimate, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP or CrossClimate?
Michelin CrossClimate, 72 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology