tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HP vs Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 16 owner reviews. How we score

Geolandar X-CV G057 is ahead, 72–64

Check price on Amazon · Geolandar X-CV G057 or Dynapro HP on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HP
Tire AHankook

Dynapro HP

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +11
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPGeolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5975

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +6
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPGeolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6776

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.6 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    49
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPGeolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online–35

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 35 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPGeolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6172

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP or Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPGeolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–72

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPGeolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6565

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 57

    Handling (owners)

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +17
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPGeolandar X-CV G057
    Reviews found online5774
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Dynapro HPYokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
Relative Score 64 72
Dry 62 73
Wet 68 74
Snow – 49
Comfort 65 71
Noise – 69
Treadwear 65 65
Handling (owners) 57 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dynapro HP

Geolandar X-CV G057

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HP

Pros

  • Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
  • Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
  • Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)

Cons

  • Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
  • Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
  • Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP review

Tire B Geolandar X-CV G057

Pros

  • Exceptional wet grip and road confidence in rainy conditions
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Crisp handling and responsive steering performance

Cons

  • Some users report faster-than-expected tread wear
  • Firm ride quality noted on certain crossover fitments
All owner themes in the Geolandar X-CV G057 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP B · Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
CategorySummerAll-Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available1464
Rim diameters16″ – 18″17″ – 22″
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—520 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HP

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057

Winner: Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 scores 74 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 scores 73 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 scores 74 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HP or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 74 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 73 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 71 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology