Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 10 reviews
Hankook Dynapro HP2 vs Yokohama W.drive V905 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 10 + 17 owner reviews. How we score
W.drive V905 is ahead, 70–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 69 · 2 tests Owners 69 · 17 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 10 in 2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
58
Dry
W.drive V905 +1169Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 W.drive V905 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 52 71 Dynapro HP2: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 58
W.drive V905: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 71.1 = 69
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
56
Wet
W.drive V905 +1874Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 W.drive V905 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 50 73 Dynapro HP2: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 50.3 = 56
W.drive V905: 60% × 73.9 + 40% × 73.4 = 74
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
59
Snow
W.drive V905 +867Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 W.drive V905 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 51 59 Dynapro HP2: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 59
W.drive V905: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 58.8 = 67
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
54
Comfort
W.drive V905 +1165Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 W.drive V905 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 47 64 Dynapro HP2: 40% × 65.1 (est.) + 60% × 46.5 = 54
W.drive V905: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 63.7 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 or W.drive V905. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison64Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 W.drive V905 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 63 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) W.drive V905: 60% × 62.9 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 64
No owner ratings of noise for W.drive V905. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
52
Treadwear
W.drive V905 +1668Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 W.drive V905 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 64 Reviews found online 43 73 Dynapro HP2: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 42.6 = 52
W.drive V905: 60% × 64 + 40% × 73.1 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
49
Handling (owners)
W.drive V905 +2271Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 W.drive V905 Reviews found online 49 71 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison65Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 W.drive V905 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP2 | Yokohama W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 70 |
| Dry | 58 | 69 |
| Wet | 56 | 74 |
| Snow | 59 | 67 |
| Comfort | 54 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 64 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 71 |
| Efficiency | – | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro HP2
W.drive V905
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP2
Pros
- Reliable handling and roadability on dry pavement
- Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance contributing to high MPG
- Capably handles towing duties on all-wheel-drive vehicles
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by multiple users
- Poor wet weather performance and dangerous sliding tendencies in rain
- Inconsistent snow traction, with some users noting a lack of confidence in winter conditions
Tire B W.drive V905
Pros
- Exceptional traction and confidence in deep and fresh snow
- Impressive tread life and durability over multiple winter seasons
- Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Higher-than-average road noise levels at highway speeds
- Mixed performance in wet conditions, with some reports of aquaplaning sensitivity
- Potential for reduced grip when temperatures rise above 10-15°C
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 | B · Yokohama W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 44 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro HP2
Yokohama W.drive V905
Winner: Yokohama W.drive V905 — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 71 vs 49 on handling.
Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 74 vs 56 on wet.
Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 68 vs 52 on treadwear.
Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 69 vs 58 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP2 or W.drive V905?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP2 or W.drive V905?
Yokohama W.drive V905, 74 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP2 or W.drive V905?
Yokohama W.drive V905, 69 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dynapro HP2 or W.drive V905?
Yokohama W.drive V905, 67 vs 59 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP2 or W.drive V905?
Yokohama W.drive V905, 65 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP2 or W.drive V905?
Yokohama W.drive V905, 68 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology