tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Yokohama W.drive V905 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 18 + 2 road tests and 1,265 + 17 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: EUROALL SEASON AS210 and W.drive V905 are level at 69.

Check price on Amazon · EUROALL SEASON AS210 Check price on Amazon · W.drive V905
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire AFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS210

All Season

± 5

Tests 70 · 18 tests Owners 68 · 1,265 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)

“Falken Euroall Season AS210 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 My mum drives an old VW Golf and needs new tyres for her car. She regularly does motorway trips and wants four tyres that will last. Two tyres that are within her budget (£300) with fitting included are the Falken Euroall Season AS210 and the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2. I'm leaning toward the Hankook just because of the brand recognition but the Falken is an all season tyre whereas the Hankook is only a summer tyre. Does this matter? The Hankook also has better fuel economy and wet braking in when I look at the EU chart but is that cancelled out by the fact it is a summer tyre and not a winter one? How much should I give to the EU rating?”

Yokohama W.drive V905
Tire BYokohama

W.drive V905

Winter

± 8

Tests 69 · 2 tests Owners 69 · 17 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 10 in 2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    W.drive V905 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210W.drive V905
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 2 tests6767
    Reviews found online6471

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 64 = 66

    W.drive V905: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 71.1 = 69

  2. 77

    Wet

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210W.drive V905
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 2 tests8274
    Reviews found online7173

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 70.9 = 77

    W.drive V905: 60% × 73.9 + 40% × 73.4 = 74

  3. 65

    Snow

    W.drive V905 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210W.drive V905
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 2 tests6472
    Reviews found online6659

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 63.6 + 40% × 66.1 = 65

    W.drive V905: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 58.8 = 67

  4. 66

    Comfort

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210W.drive V905
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6264

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 40% × 72.7 + 60% × 62.3 = 66

    W.drive V905: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 63.7 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for W.drive V905. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 45

    Noise

    W.drive V905 +19
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210W.drive V905
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 1 tests3163
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 30.8 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 45

    W.drive V905: 60% × 62.9 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 64

    No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210 or W.drive V905. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210W.drive V905
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests7764
    Reviews found online7173

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 71.3 = 75

    W.drive V905: 60% × 64 + 40% × 73.1 = 68

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    W.drive V905 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210W.drive V905
    Reviews found online6571
  8. 24

    Efficiency

    W.drive V905 +41
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210W.drive V905
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 1 tests2465
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken EUROALL SEASON AS210Yokohama W.drive V905
Relative Score 69 69
Dry 66 69
Wet 77 74
Snow 65 67
Comfort 66 65
Noise 45 64
Treadwear 75 68
Handling (owners) 65 71
Efficiency 24 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

EUROALL SEASON AS210

± 8

W.drive V905

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEUROALL SEASON AS210W.drive V905ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 66% #7/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 98% #5/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 88% #5/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 98% #11/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 100% #1/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 91% #20/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 78% #5/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 93% #9/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 97% #9/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 100% #1/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 92% #14/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 74% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 96% #16/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test 96% #18/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 66% #12/16 · 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test 67% #17/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 50% #9/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 84% #18/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #14/15 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test #15/20 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 62% #4/15 · 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 59% #14/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #9/9 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 #4/5 2022 Consumer Reports Performance Winter/Snow Tires – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EUROALL SEASON AS210

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
  • Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
  • Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS210 review

Tire B W.drive V905

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and confidence in deep and fresh snow
  • Impressive tread life and durability over multiple winter seasons
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Higher-than-average road noise levels at highway speeds
  • Mixed performance in wet conditions, with some reports of aquaplaning sensitivity
  • Potential for reduced grip when temperatures rise above 10-15°C
All owner themes in the W.drive V905 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Neutral

Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.

r/CarTalkUK ·13 upvotes ·2021-08-19

“All Season tyre vs Summer tyre with better wet grip? I’ve always just assumed that All Season tyres are going to be better for driving in wet conditions than the equivalent summer tyre, but now I’m confused. See these Falken tyres for example: Falken Sincera SN 110 - EU Wet Grip class A. Falken Euroall Season AS210 - EU Wet Grip class B-C The summer tyres are also cheaper & have better fuel economy according to the EU labels. What would be the advantage of all season tyres in these scenarios? Or am I missing something really obvious regarding how the EU ratings work? Read more”
Top themes
#budget tire comparison#all-season vs summer#EU label wet grip#fuel economy ratings#winter driving alternatives

Based on 10 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama W.drive V905

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 B · Yokohama W.drive V905
CategoryAll SeasonWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available92—
Rim diameters13″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Yokohama W.drive V905

Too close to call: Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 and Yokohama W.drive V905 are within 2 points overall. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 is stronger on treadwear and wet. Yokohama W.drive V905 is stronger on efficiency, noise and handling.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 65 vs 24 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 64 vs 45 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 75 vs 68 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 71 vs 65 on handling.

Tire A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama W.drive V905
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EUROALL SEASON AS210 or W.drive V905?

Which is better in the wet, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or W.drive V905?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 77 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or W.drive V905?

Yokohama W.drive V905, 69 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or W.drive V905?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or W.drive V905?

Yokohama W.drive V905, 64 vs 45 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or W.drive V905?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or W.drive V905?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 75 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or W.drive V905?

Yokohama W.drive V905, 65 vs 24 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology