Head-to-head Updated

Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs Yokohama W.drive V905 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 2 road tests and 17 + 17 owner reviews. How we score

W.drive V905 is ahead, 69–60

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Tire AKumho

WinterCraft WP71

Winter

± 7

Tests 70 · 6 tests Owners 48 · 17 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test (snow handling)

Yokohama W.drive V905
Tire BYokohama

W.drive V905

Winter

± 8

Tests 69 · 2 tests Owners 69 · 17 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 10 in 2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 53

    Dry

    W.drive V905 +16
    69
    Why this score
    SourceWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests6267
    Reviews found online3971
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–197%98%

    WinterCraft WP71: 60% × 62.1 + 40% × 38.5 = 53

    W.drive V905: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 71.1 = 69

  2. 64

    Wet

    W.drive V905 +10
    74
    Why this score
    SourceWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 2 tests7674
    Reviews found online4873
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–091%91%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–193%93%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–195%97%

    WinterCraft WP71: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 47.7 = 64

    W.drive V905: 60% × 73.9 + 40% × 73.4 = 74

  3. 68

    Snow

    WinterCraft WP71 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 2 tests7372
    Reviews found online6059
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–189%92%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–096%96%

    WinterCraft WP71: 60% × 73 + 40% × 60.3 = 68

    W.drive V905: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 58.8 = 67

  4. 46

    Comfort

    W.drive V905 +19
    65
    Why this score
    SourceWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online3464

    WinterCraft WP71: 40% × 62.9 (est.) + 60% × 34.3 = 46

    W.drive V905: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 63.7 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for WinterCraft WP71 or W.drive V905. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 73

    Noise

    WinterCraft WP71 +9
    64
    Why this score
    SourceWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests7863
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%96%

    WinterCraft WP71: 60% × 77.8 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 73

    W.drive V905: 60% × 62.9 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 64

    No owner ratings of noise for WinterCraft WP71 or W.drive V905. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    W.drive V905 +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests6964
    Reviews found online5373
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–088%67%

    WinterCraft WP71: 60% × 68.8 + 40% × 52.9 = 62

    W.drive V905: 60% × 64 + 40% × 73.1 = 68

  7. 38

    Handling (owners)

    W.drive V905 +33
    71
    Why this score
    SourceWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905
    Reviews found online3871
  8. 52

    Efficiency

    W.drive V905 +13
    65
    Why this score
    SourceWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests5265
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–091%84%
Scores at a glance
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs Yokohama W.drive V905: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho WinterCraft WP71Yokohama W.drive V905
Relative Score 60 69
Dry 53 69
Wet 64 74
Snow 68 67
Comfort 46 65
Noise 73 64
Treadwear 62 68
Handling (owners) 38 71
Efficiency 52 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

WinterCraft WP71

± 8

W.drive V905

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Kumho WinterCraft WP71 finished ahead 1 times and Yokohama W.drive V905 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 98% 98% +0.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Dry Handling Dry 97% 98% −1.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 91% 91% +0.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Wet Braking Wet 93% 93% −0.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Wet Handling Wet 95% 97% −1.9 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Snow Braking Snow 89% 92% −2.8 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Snow Handling Snow 96% 96% +0.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Noise Noise 98% 96% +2.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Wear Treadwear 88% 67% +20.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 91% 84% +7.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #5/20 #15/20 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Value Cost 82% 59% +22.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Overall Ranking Overall #12/20 #15/20 – 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A WinterCraft WP71

Pros

  • Strong traction and braking performance in deep snow and slush
  • Competitive price point compared to premium winter tire alternatives
  • Predictable handling in dry winter conditions

Cons

  • Excessive road noise, particularly at low to moderate speeds
  • Vague or 'spongy' steering feedback and handling characteristics
  • Inconsistent lateral grip and understeer issues on wet roads
All owner themes in the WinterCraft WP71 review

Tire B W.drive V905

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and confidence in deep and fresh snow
  • Impressive tread life and durability over multiple winter seasons
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Higher-than-average road noise levels at highway speeds
  • Mixed performance in wet conditions, with some reports of aquaplaning sensitivity
  • Potential for reduced grip when temperatures rise above 10-15°C
All owner themes in the W.drive V905 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho WinterCraft WP71 B · Yokohama W.drive V905
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

Yokohama W.drive V905

Winner: Yokohama W.drive V905 — better handling, comfort and dry. Pick the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 71 vs 38 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 65 vs 46 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 69 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 65 vs 52 on efficiency.

Tire A · Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Tire B · Yokohama W.drive V905

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

WinterCraft WP71 or W.drive V905?

Which is better in the wet, WinterCraft WP71 or W.drive V905?

Yokohama W.drive V905, 74 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, WinterCraft WP71 or W.drive V905?

Yokohama W.drive V905, 69 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, WinterCraft WP71 or W.drive V905?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, WinterCraft WP71 or W.drive V905?

Kumho WinterCraft WP71, 73 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, WinterCraft WP71 or W.drive V905?

Yokohama W.drive V905, 65 vs 46 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, WinterCraft WP71 or W.drive V905?

Yokohama W.drive V905, 68 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, WinterCraft WP71 or W.drive V905?

Yokohama W.drive V905, 65 vs 52 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology