tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 18 road tests and 26 + 1,265 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 73–68

Check price on Amazon · CrossContact LX25 or EUROALL SEASON AS210 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire BFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS210

All Season

± 5

Tests 70 · 18 tests Owners 68 · 1,265 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)

“Falken Euroall Season AS210 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 My mum drives an old VW Golf and needs new tyres for her car. She regularly does motorway trips and wants four tyres that will last. Two tyres that are within her budget (£300) with fitting included are the Falken Euroall Season AS210 and the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2. I'm leaning toward the Hankook just because of the brand recognition but the Falken is an all season tyre whereas the Hankook is only a summer tyre. Does this matter? The Hankook also has better fuel economy and wet braking in when I look at the EU chart but is that cancelled out by the fact it is a summer tyre and not a winter one? How much should I give to the EU rating?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    CrossContact LX25 +9
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 18 tests7067
    Reviews found online8364

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 83 = 75

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 64 = 66

  2. 80

    Wet

    CrossContact LX25 +3
    77
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests≈ 78 (est.)82
    Reviews found online8371

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.3 = 80

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 70.9 = 77

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).

  3. 53

    Snow

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +12
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 14 tests4064
    Reviews found online7166

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40 + 40% × 71.4 = 53

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 63.6 + 40% × 66.1 = 65

  4. 76

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +10
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 71 (est.)73
    Reviews found online8062

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 80 = 76

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 40% × 72.7 + 60% × 62.3 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Noise

    CrossContact LX25 +26
    45
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests≈ 67 (est.)31
    Reviews found online78≈ 67 (est.)

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 71

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 30.8 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 45

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +3
    75
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 70 (est.)77
    Reviews found online7671

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 72

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 71.3 = 75

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact LX25 +14
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Reviews found online7965
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    24
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests–24
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Relative Score 73 68
Dry 75 66
Wet 80 77
Snow 53 65
Comfort 76 66
Noise 71 45
Treadwear 72 75
Handling (owners) 79 65
Efficiency – 24

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

± 5

EUROALL SEASON AS210

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS210ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady 66% #7/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 68% #3/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady 71% #4/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady #9/9 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B EUROALL SEASON AS210

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
  • Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
  • Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS210 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental CrossContact LX25

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Neutral

Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.

r/CarTalkUK ·13 upvotes ·2021-08-19

“All Season tyre vs Summer tyre with better wet grip? I’ve always just assumed that All Season tyres are going to be better for driving in wet conditions than the equivalent summer tyre, but now I’m confused. See these Falken tyres for example: Falken Sincera SN 110 - EU Wet Grip class A. Falken Euroall Season AS210 - EU Wet Grip class B-C The summer tyres are also cheaper & have better fuel economy according to the EU labels. What would be the advantage of all season tyres in these scenarios? Or am I missing something really obvious regarding how the EU ratings work? Read more”
Top themes
#budget tire comparison#all-season vs summer#EU label wet grip#fuel economy ratings#winter driving alternatives

Based on 10 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4092
Rim diameters16″ – 22″13″ – 20″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common2222

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better noise, handling and comfort. Pick the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 if snow and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 71 vs 45 on noise.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 65 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 66 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 65 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 45 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 75 vs 72 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology