tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Laufenn G Fit 4S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 18 + 6 road tests and 1,265 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

G Fit 4S is ahead, 75–69

Check price on Amazon · G Fit 4S or EUROALL SEASON AS210 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire AFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS210

All Season

± 5

Tests 70 · 18 tests Owners 68 · 1,265 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)

“Falken Euroall Season AS210 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 My mum drives an old VW Golf and needs new tyres for her car. She regularly does motorway trips and wants four tyres that will last. Two tyres that are within her budget (£300) with fitting included are the Falken Euroall Season AS210 and the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2. I'm leaning toward the Hankook just because of the brand recognition but the Falken is an all season tyre whereas the Hankook is only a summer tyre. Does this matter? The Hankook also has better fuel economy and wet braking in when I look at the EU chart but is that cancelled out by the fact it is a summer tyre and not a winter one? How much should I give to the EU rating?”

Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire BLaufenn

G Fit 4S

All Season

± 6

Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 81 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test (wet circle)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    G Fit 4S +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 6 tests6765
    Reviews found online6481
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–090%87%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 64 = 66

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 81.3 = 72

  2. 77

    Wet

    G Fit 4S +8
    85
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 6 tests8286
    Reviews found online7185
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–092%87%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 70.9 = 77

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 84.8 = 85

  3. 65

    Snow

    G Fit 4S +12
    77
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 2 tests6477
    Reviews found online6677

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 63.6 + 40% × 66.1 = 65

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 76.8 = 77

  4. 66

    Comfort

    G Fit 4S +10
    76
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7372
    Reviews found online6279

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 40% × 72.7 + 60% × 62.3 = 66

    G Fit 4S: 40% × 71.7 + 60% × 78.5 = 76

  5. 45

    Noise

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +7
    38
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 2 tests3119
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 30.8 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 45

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 18.5 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 38

    No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210 or G Fit 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    Level
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests7772
    Reviews found online7179

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 71.3 = 75

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 78.6 = 75

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    G Fit 4S +15
    80
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210G Fit 4S
    Reviews found online6580
  8. 24

    Efficiency

    G Fit 4S +23
    47
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 2 tests2447
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken EUROALL SEASON AS210Laufenn G Fit 4S
Relative Score 69 75
Dry 66 72
Wet 77 85
Snow 65 77
Comfort 66 76
Noise 45 38
Treadwear 75 75
Handling (owners) 65 80
Efficiency 24 47

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

EUROALL SEASON AS210

± 6

G Fit 4S

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 finished ahead 2 times and Laufenn G Fit 4S 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryEUROALL SEASON AS210G Fit 4SΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 90% 87% +2.2 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 195/55 R16
Wet Braking Wet 92% 87% +5.7 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 195/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #11/35 #16/35 – 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 195/55 R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EUROALL SEASON AS210

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
  • Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
  • Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS210 review

Tire B G Fit 4S

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
  • High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
  • Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
All owner themes in the G Fit 4S review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Neutral

Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.

r/CarTalkUK ·13 upvotes ·2021-08-19

“All Season tyre vs Summer tyre with better wet grip? I’ve always just assumed that All Season tyres are going to be better for driving in wet conditions than the equivalent summer tyre, but now I’m confused. See these Falken tyres for example: Falken Sincera SN 110 - EU Wet Grip class A. Falken Euroall Season AS210 - EU Wet Grip class B-C The summer tyres are also cheaper & have better fuel economy according to the EU labels. What would be the advantage of all season tyres in these scenarios? Or am I missing something really obvious regarding how the EU ratings work? Read more”
Top themes
#budget tire comparison#all-season vs summer#EU label wet grip#fuel economy ratings#winter driving alternatives

Based on 10 community posts

Tire B

Laufenn G Fit 4S

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 B · Laufenn G Fit 4S
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available9279
Rim diameters13″ – 20″13″ – 20″
Sizes in common7171

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Laufenn G Fit 4S

Winner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better efficiency, handling and snow. Pick the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 47 vs 24 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 80 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 77 vs 65 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 76 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is dry braking

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 2 of 2 shared dry braking tests.

Tire A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Laufenn G Fit 4S
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EUROALL SEASON AS210 or G Fit 4S?

Which is better in the wet, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or G Fit 4S?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 85 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or G Fit 4S?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 72 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or G Fit 4S?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 77 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or G Fit 4S?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 45 vs 38 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or G Fit 4S?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 76 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or G Fit 4S?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or G Fit 4S?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 47 vs 24 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology