Tests – · 1 test Owners 75 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 18 road tests and 32 + 1,265 owner reviews. How we score
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus leads, 73–69 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 75 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Tests 70 · 18 tests Owners 68 · 1,265 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)
“Falken Euroall Season AS210 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 My mum drives an old VW Golf and needs new tyres for her car. She regularly does motorway trips and wants four tyres that will last. Two tyres that are within her budget (£300) with fitting included are the Falken Euroall Season AS210 and the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2. I'm leaning toward the Hankook just because of the brand recognition but the Falken is an all season tyre whereas the Hankook is only a summer tyre. Does this matter? The Hankook also has better fuel economy and wet braking in when I look at the EU chart but is that cancelled out by the fact it is a summer tyre and not a winter one? How much should I give to the EU rating?”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | EUROALL SEASON AS210 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests | ≈ 72 (est.) | 67 |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 64 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74
EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 64 = 66
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | EUROALL SEASON AS210 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests | ≈ 73 (est.) | 82 |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 71 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 75 = 74
EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 70.9 = 77
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | EUROALL SEASON AS210 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests | ≈ 70 (est.) | 64 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 66 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 70
EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 63.6 + 40% × 66.1 = 65
No road tests of snow for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | EUROALL SEASON AS210 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 70 (est.) | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 62 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 76.8 = 74
EUROALL SEASON AS210: 40% × 72.7 + 60% × 62.3 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | EUROALL SEASON AS210 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests | ≈ 67 (est.) | 31 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 69
EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 30.8 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 45
No road tests of noise for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | EUROALL SEASON AS210 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests | 70 | 77 |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 71 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 69.5 + 40% × 76.6 = 72
EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 71.3 = 75
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | EUROALL SEASON AS210 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 71 | 65 |
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | EUROALL SEASON AS210 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests | – | 24 |
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 69 |
| Dry | 74 | 66 |
| Wet | 74 | 77 |
| Snow | 70 | 65 |
| Comfort | 74 | 66 |
| Noise | 69 | 45 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 65 |
| Efficiency | – | 24 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus
EUROALL SEASON AS210
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | EUROALL SEASON AS210 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/13 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires | #9/9 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.
Based on 10 community posts
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | B · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 92 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 20″ | 13″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 800 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus — better noise, dry and comfort. Pick the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 if wet and treadwear matter most to you.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus scores 69 vs 45 on noise.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus scores 74 vs 66 on dry.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus scores 74 vs 66 on comfort.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus scores 71 vs 65 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 77 vs 74 on our wet score.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus, 70 vs 65 on our snow score.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus, 69 vs 45 on our noise score.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus, 74 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 75 vs 72 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology