Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews
Hankook Dynapro M/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Firestone F590 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro M/T vs Firestone F590 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro M/T is ahead, 65–56
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Dynapro M/T +1155Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T F590 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 64 47 Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 66
F590: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 55
No road tests of dry for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for F590. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
68
Wet
Dynapro M/T +1157Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T F590 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 66 51 Dynapro M/T: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68
F590: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 57
No road tests of wet for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for F590. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T F590 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) – Reviews found online 68 – Dynapro M/T: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69
No road tests of snow for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
58
Comfort
F590 +361Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T F590 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 53 57 Dynapro M/T: 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 53.2 = 58
F590: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 57 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for F590. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
66
Treadwear
Dynapro M/T +858Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T F590 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 66 54 Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 66
F590: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for F590. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
61
Handling (owners)
Dynapro M/T +1546Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T F590 Reviews found online 61 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro M/T | Firestone F590 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 56 |
| Dry | 66 | 55 |
| Wet | 68 | 57 |
| Snow | 69 | – |
| Comfort | 58 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Dynapro M/T
56
/ 100
F590
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro M/T
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
- Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD
Cons
- Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
- Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
- Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
Tire B F590
Pros
- Effective hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
- Adequate dry grip for standard daily driving
- Reliable performance for basic commuting needs
Cons
- Poor traction during low-speed acceleration leading to wheel spin
- Premature tread wear and sidewall perishing
- Inconsistent wet weather performance causing safety concerns
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro M/T | B · Firestone F590 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mud-Terrain tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| UTQG | — | 440 A B |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro M/T
56
/ 100
Firestone F590
Winner: Hankook Dynapro M/T — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Firestone F590 if comfort matters most to you. Hankook Dynapro M/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Firestone F590 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 61 vs 46 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 66 vs 55 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 68 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 66 vs 58 on treadwear.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro M/T
Tire B · Firestone F590
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro M/T or F590?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro M/T or F590?
Hankook Dynapro M/T, 68 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro M/T or F590?
Hankook Dynapro M/T, 66 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro M/T or F590?
Firestone F590, 61 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro M/T or F590?
Hankook Dynapro M/T, 66 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology