Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews
Hankook Dynapro M/T vs Firestone F590 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Dynapro M/T is ahead, 65–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Dynapro M/T +1253Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T F590 Reviews found online 64 45 -
68
Wet
Dynapro M/T +1355Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T F590 Reviews found online 67 50 -
69
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T F590 Reviews found online 69 – -
62
Comfort
F590 +365Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T F590 Reviews found online 54 60 -
66
Treadwear
Dynapro M/T +561Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T F590 Reviews found online 67 57 -
61
Handling
Dynapro M/T +1546Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T F590 Reviews found online 61 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro M/T | Firestone F590 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 55 |
| Dry | 65 | 53 |
| Wet | 68 | 55 |
| Snow | 69 | – |
| Comfort | 62 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 61 |
| Handling | 61 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Dynapro M/T
F590
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro M/T
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
- Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD
Cons
- Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
- Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
- Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
Tire B F590
Pros
- Effective hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
- Adequate dry grip for standard daily driving
- Reliable performance for basic commuting needs
Cons
- Poor traction during low-speed acceleration leading to wheel spin
- Premature tread wear and sidewall perishing
- Inconsistent wet weather performance causing safety concerns
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro M/T | B · Firestone F590 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro M/T
Firestone F590
Winner: Hankook Dynapro M/T — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Firestone F590 if comfort matters most to you.
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 61 vs 46 on handling.
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 68 vs 55 on wet.
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 65 vs 53 on dry.
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 66 vs 61 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.