tirewheelguide

Hankook Dynapro M/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Hankook Optimo H724 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro M/T vs Hankook Optimo H724 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 169 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Dynapro M/T and Optimo H724 are level at 67.

Check price on Amazon · Dynapro M/T Check price on Amazon · Optimo H724
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro M/T
Tire AHankook

Dynapro M/T

Mud-Terrain tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews

Hankook Optimo H724
Tire BHankook

Optimo H724

All-Season tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 169 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Optimo H724 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TOptimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6566

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66

    Optimo H724: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Optimo H724 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TOptimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6768

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    Optimo H724: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Dynapro M/T +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TOptimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6958

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 70

    Optimo H724: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.4 = 63

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    Optimo H724 +7
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TOptimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5465

    Dynapro M/T: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 53.8 = 59

    Optimo H724: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 64.9 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro M/T or Optimo H724. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TOptimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–69

    Optimo H724: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Optimo H724. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TOptimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6666

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 66

    Optimo H724: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TOptimo H724
    Reviews found online61–
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Dynapro M/THankook Optimo H724
Relative Score 67 67
Dry 66 67
Wet 68 69
Snow 70 63
Comfort 59 66
Noise – 68
Treadwear 66 66
Handling (owners) 61 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Dynapro M/T

± 8

Optimo H724

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro M/T

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
  • Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD

Cons

  • Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
  • Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
  • Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
All owner themes in the Dynapro M/T review

Tire B Optimo H724

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro M/T B · Hankook Optimo H724
CategoryMud-Terrain tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—500 A B
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro M/T

Hankook Optimo H724

Too close to call: Hankook Dynapro M/T and Hankook Optimo H724 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Dynapro M/T is stronger on snow. Hankook Optimo H724 is stronger on comfort. Hankook Dynapro M/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 70 vs 63 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Optimo H724 scores 66 vs 59 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro M/T
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Optimo H724
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro M/T or Optimo H724?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro M/T or Optimo H724?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro M/T or Optimo H724?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro M/T or Optimo H724?

Hankook Dynapro M/T, 70 vs 63 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro M/T or Optimo H724?

Hankook Optimo H724, 66 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro M/T or Optimo H724?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology