Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews
Hankook Dynapro M/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Dynapro M/T vs Toyo Open Country M/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 241 owner reviews. How we score
Open Country M/T leads, 68–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 241 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Open Country M/T +268Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Open Country M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 64 69 Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 66
Open Country M/T: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 68
No road tests of dry for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Open Country M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
68
Wet
Open Country M/T +472Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Open Country M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 66 72 Dynapro M/T: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68
Open Country M/T: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 72
No road tests of wet for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Open Country M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Snow
Dynapro M/T +168Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Open Country M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 68 67 Dynapro M/T: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69
Open Country M/T: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 68
No road tests of snow for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Open Country M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
58
Comfort
Open Country M/T +462Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Open Country M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 53 58 Dynapro M/T: 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 53.2 = 58
Open Country M/T: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.2 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Open Country M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison64Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Open Country M/T Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 60 Open Country M/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64
No road tests of noise for Open Country M/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Dynapro M/T +165Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Open Country M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 66 64 Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 66
Open Country M/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Open Country M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
61
Handling (owners)
Open Country M/T +263Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Open Country M/T Reviews found online 61 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro M/T | Toyo Open Country M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 68 |
| Dry | 66 | 68 |
| Wet | 68 | 72 |
| Snow | 69 | 68 |
| Comfort | 58 | 62 |
| Noise | – | 64 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro M/T
Open Country M/T
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro M/T
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
- Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD
Cons
- Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
- Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
- Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
Tire B Open Country M/T
Pros
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, gravel, and snow
- Surprisingly low road noise and smooth ride quality for a mud-terrain tire
- Rugged, durable sidewalls with high puncture resistance
Cons
- High initial purchase price
- Negative impact on vehicle fuel economy (MPG)
- Reduced grip or slight slickness on wet pavement or icy roads
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro M/T | B · Toyo Open Country M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mud-Terrain tire | Mud-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 35 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | — | 18 - 22/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 35 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro M/T
Toyo Open Country M/T
Narrow edge: Toyo Open Country M/T — better wet and comfort. Where the Hankook Dynapro M/T is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Hankook Dynapro M/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo Open Country M/T scores 72 vs 68 on wet.
Toyo Open Country M/T scores 62 vs 58 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro M/T or Open Country M/T?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro M/T or Open Country M/T?
Toyo Open Country M/T, 72 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro M/T or Open Country M/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Dynapro M/T or Open Country M/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro M/T or Open Country M/T?
Toyo Open Country M/T, 62 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro M/T or Open Country M/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology