Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 vs Laufenn G Fit EQ+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 1,592 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Tire AHankook

Kinergy Eco 2

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 50 · 1,592 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (noise)

Laufenn G Fit EQ+
Tire BLaufenn

G Fit EQ+

Summer Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 3 reviews (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2G Fit EQ+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests72–
    Reviews found online50–

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 50.1 = 63

  2. 66

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2G Fit EQ+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests75–
    Reviews found online54–

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 53.6 = 66

  3. 54

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2G Fit EQ+
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online46–

    Kinergy Eco 2: 40% × 64.9 (est.) + 60% × 45.9 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2G Fit EQ+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests75–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy Eco 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 55

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2G Fit EQ+
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)–
    Reviews found online47–

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 50

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2G Fit EQ+
    Reviews found online50–
  7. 75

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2G Fit EQ+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests75–
Scores at a glance
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 vs Laufenn G Fit EQ+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Kinergy Eco 2Laufenn G Fit EQ+
Relative Score 61 –
Dry 63 –
Wet 66 –
Comfort 54 –
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 55 –
Handling (owners) 50 –
Efficiency 75 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Kinergy Eco 2

G Fit EQ+

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryKinergy Eco 2G Fit EQ+ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #8/11 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test #7/16 2022 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 15 Inch – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kinergy Eco 2

Pros

  • Reliable dry and wet road grip
  • Good value for the price point
  • Slow and even tread wear / long-lasting durability

Cons

  • Notable road noise reported by some users
  • Stiff ride quality that can amplify road bumps
  • Reduced performance and grip in wet or cold conditions as tread wears down
All owner themes in the Kinergy Eco 2 review

Tire B G Fit EQ+

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions
  • Reliable handling on dry surfaces
  • Strong value for money

Cons

  • Slightly elevated road noise reported during operation
All owner themes in the G Fit EQ+ review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 B · Laufenn G Fit EQ+
CategorySummerSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4834
Rim diameters13″ – 17″13″ – 17″
Sizes in common2727

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

Laufenn G Fit EQ+

Only Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Tire B · Laufenn G Fit EQ+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology