Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews
“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro AT2 vs Laufenn G Fit EQ+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 218 + 3 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 G Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) – Reviews found online 51 – Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
59
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 G Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) – Reviews found online 54 – Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 59
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 G Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) – Reviews found online 56 – Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 61
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
53
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 G Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) – Reviews found online 46 – Dynapro AT2: 40% × 64.9 (est.) + 60% × 45.6 = 53
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
55
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 G Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) – Reviews found online 48 – Dynapro AT2: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 48.2 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
48
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 G Fit EQ+ Reviews found online 48 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AT2 | Laufenn G Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | – |
| Dry | 57 | – |
| Wet | 59 | – |
| Snow | 61 | – |
| Comfort | 53 | – |
| Treadwear | 55 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 48 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
57
/ 100
Dynapro AT2
–
/ 100
G Fit EQ+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro AT2
Pros
- Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
- Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
- Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
- Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
- Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
Tire B G Fit EQ+
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions
- Reliable handling on dry surfaces
- Strong value for money
Cons
- Slightly elevated road noise reported during operation
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Community sentiment regarding the Hankook Dynapro AT2 line is divided, heavily dependent on whether users evaluate the OEM factory tire or the retail/Xtreme version. The standard OEM AT2 receives notable criticism for lacking true all-terrain capability, poor wet/winter grip, and premature wear, while highway comfort and quietness are praised. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for strong snow traction, improved wet performance, durability, and quiet road manners.
f150lightningforum.com
·2025-03-08
“I’ve had the Hankook Dynapro AT2s on another truck and their Dynapro AS on my Expedition. Both were terrible, even dangerous. Got rid of them early on both vehicles. My Lightning came with the General Grabbers. The Grabbers are decent, actually handle snow and wet very well, but are worthless for slush and ice. They’re not good on dirt. But I’ve kept them on now for a bit over 2 years. I’ll be replacing them before next winter as it will be about time anyway. Definitely want to go with something a bit more aggressive or winter-capable, just not sure which tires as of yet. Can’t really afford to sacrifice any range… Maybe just a tiny bit is all.”
r/TyreReviews
·1 upvote ·2023-03-21
“I just got the extreme at2 and they are awesome and quiet. Did go on an easy/moderate off-road in Broken Bow, OK and they did outstanding!”
f150forum.com
“I had the Hankook AT2 on my 2019 from the factory and they were way better than the Pirelli's that came on my '15 and my '22 F-150 FX4 trucks. They may not be a true AT tire, but they gave me 50,000 miles and functioned well in MN winters as on road tire and did well enough on the small number of off road excursions they took me on while hunting ( half mile to mile dirt trails and across various set-aside agricultural fields).”
Top themes
#OEM versus retail differences#Wet traction and braking#Winter and snow performance#Highway noise and comfort#Tread life and durability#Dynapro AT2 Xtreme upgrades
Based on 56 community posts
Tire B
Laufenn G Fit EQ+
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AT2 | B · Laufenn G Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 33 | 34 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 13″ – 17″ |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
57
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro AT2
–
/ 100
Laufenn G Fit EQ+
Only Hankook Dynapro AT2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AT2
Tire B · Laufenn G Fit EQ+
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology