Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 50 · 1,595 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (noise)
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 vs Michelin Defender T+H — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 1 road tests and 1,595 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Defender T+H is ahead, 71–61
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Defender T+H +669Why this score
Source Kinergy Eco 2 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests 72 ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 50 70 Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 49.5 = 63
Defender T+H: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
No road tests of dry for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
66
Wet
Defender T+H +672Why this score
Source Kinergy Eco 2 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests 75 ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 53 73 Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 53.4 = 66
Defender T+H: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 72
No road tests of wet for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison65Why this score
Source Kinergy Eco 2 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online – 61 Defender T+H: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65
No road tests of snow for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
53
Comfort
Defender T+H +1467Why this score
Source Kinergy Eco 2 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 45 66 Kinergy Eco 2: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 45.3 = 53
Defender T+H: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 66 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
71
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Kinergy Eco 2 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests 75 – Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) – Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71
No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy Eco 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
55
Treadwear
Defender T+H +1873Why this score
Source Kinergy Eco 2 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 48 68 Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 55
Defender T+H: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 67.9 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
49
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Kinergy Eco 2 Defender T+H Reviews found online 49 – -
75
Efficiency
No comparison–Why this score
Source Kinergy Eco 2 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 75 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 | Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 71 |
| Dry | 63 | 69 |
| Wet | 66 | 72 |
| Snow | – | 65 |
| Comfort | 53 | 67 |
| Noise | 71 | – |
| Treadwear | 55 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | – |
| Efficiency | 75 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
61
/ 100
Kinergy Eco 2
71
/ 100
Defender T+H
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Kinergy Eco 2 | Defender T+H | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/11 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | #1/8 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Kinergy Eco 2
Pros
- Reliable dry and wet road grip
- Good value for the price point
- Slow and even tread wear / long-lasting durability
Cons
- Notable road noise reported by some users
- Stiff ride quality that can amplify road bumps
- Reduced performance and grip in wet or cold conditions as tread wears down
Tire B Defender T+H
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 | B · Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 48 | — |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 17″ | — |
| UTQG | 200 - 400 A - B A | 820 A - B B |
Which one should you actually buy?
61
/ 100
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
71
/ 100
Michelin Defender T+H
Winner: Michelin Defender T+H — better treadwear, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender T+H rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Defender T+H scores 67 vs 53 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Defender T+H scores 69 vs 63 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Defender T+H scores 72 vs 66 on wet.
Tire A · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Tire B · Michelin Defender T+H
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Kinergy Eco 2 or Defender T+H?
Which is better in the wet, Kinergy Eco 2 or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 72 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Kinergy Eco 2 or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 69 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Kinergy Eco 2 or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 67 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Kinergy Eco 2 or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology