tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 vs Toyo Proxes CF1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 1,589 + 46 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes CF1 is ahead, 69–63

Check price on Amazon · Proxes CF1 or Kinergy Eco 2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Tire AHankook

Kinergy Eco 2

Summer

Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 55 · 1,589 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (noise)

Toyo Proxes CF1
Tire BToyo

Proxes CF1

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Proxes CF1 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2Proxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests72≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5570

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 55.4 = 65

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Proxes CF1 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2Proxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests75≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6172

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.5 + 40% × 60.5 = 69

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 61

    Comfort

    Proxes CF1 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2Proxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5269

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 61

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy Eco 2 or Proxes CF1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2Proxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests75–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy Eco 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 57

    Treadwear

    Proxes CF1 +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2Proxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5160

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 54

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes CF1 +15
    69
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2Proxes CF1
    Reviews found online5469
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Kinergy Eco 2Toyo Proxes CF1
Relative Score 63 69
Dry 65 69
Wet 69 72
Comfort 61 69
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 57 62
Handling (owners) 54 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Kinergy Eco 2

Proxes CF1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kinergy Eco 2

Pros

  • Reliable dry and wet road grip
  • Good value for the price point
  • Slow and even tread wear / long-lasting durability

Cons

  • Notable road noise reported by some users
  • Stiff ride quality that can amplify road bumps
  • Reduced performance and grip in wet or cold conditions as tread wears down
All owner themes in the Kinergy Eco 2 review

Tire B Proxes CF1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
  • Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
All owner themes in the Proxes CF1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 B · Toyo Proxes CF1
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available48—
Rim diameters13″ – 17″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

Toyo Proxes CF1

Winner: Toyo Proxes CF1 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 62 vs 57 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 65 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF1
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kinergy Eco 2 or Proxes CF1?

Which is better in the wet, Kinergy Eco 2 or Proxes CF1?

Toyo Proxes CF1, 72 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Kinergy Eco 2 or Proxes CF1?

Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Kinergy Eco 2 or Proxes CF1?

Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Kinergy Eco 2 or Proxes CF1?

Toyo Proxes CF1, 62 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology