Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 vs Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 3 road tests and 1,598 + 1,928 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth-GT AE51 is ahead, 72–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Tire AHankook

Kinergy Eco 2

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 50 · 1,598 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (noise)

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51
Tire BYokohama

BluEarth-GT AE51

Summer

± 6

Tests 68 · 3 tests Owners 77 · 1,928 reviews

Best test result: #4 of 8 in 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

“Are the Yokohama BlueEarth GT AE51 all seasons tires or summer tires? After google searching it, some say it's summer tires other say it's all seasons. From the thread pattern on it, it looks like a summer tire. The shop owner told me it's all season tires. Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    BluEarth-GT AE51 +12
    75
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2BluEarth-GT AE51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 3 tests7270
    Reviews found online5082

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 49.6 = 63

    BluEarth-GT AE51: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 81.7 = 75

  2. 66

    Wet

    BluEarth-GT AE51 +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2BluEarth-GT AE51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 3 tests7564
    Reviews found online5378

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 53.3 = 66

    BluEarth-GT AE51: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 78.1 = 70

  3. 53

    Comfort

    BluEarth-GT AE51 +21
    74
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2BluEarth-GT AE51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online4576

    Kinergy Eco 2: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 45.2 = 53

    BluEarth-GT AE51: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 76.2 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth-GT AE51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 71

    Noise

    Kinergy Eco 2 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2BluEarth-GT AE51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests7571
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 71

    BluEarth-GT AE51: 60% × 70.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy Eco 2 or BluEarth-GT AE51. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 55

    Treadwear

    BluEarth-GT AE51 +13
    68
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2BluEarth-GT AE51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4870

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 55

    BluEarth-GT AE51: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth-GT AE51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 49

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth-GT AE51 +30
    79
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2BluEarth-GT AE51
    Reviews found online4979
  7. 75

    Efficiency

    BluEarth-GT AE51 +2
    77
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy Eco 2BluEarth-GT AE51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7577
Scores at a glance
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 vs Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Kinergy Eco 2Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51
Relative Score 61 72
Dry 63 75
Wet 66 70
Comfort 53 74
Noise 71 69
Treadwear 55 68
Handling (owners) 49 79
Efficiency 75 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Kinergy Eco 2

± 6

BluEarth-GT AE51

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryKinergy Eco 2BluEarth-GT AE51ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 94% #9/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test 97% #4/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #5/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test 98% #10/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 95% #10/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test 96% #7/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 91% #7/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test 93% #5/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 97% #8/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test 99% #4/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #4/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test 99% #5/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 99% #3/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test 82% #5/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 87% #4/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test 73% #6/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #8/11 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test #5/8 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kinergy Eco 2

Pros

  • Reliable dry and wet road grip
  • Good value for the price point
  • Slow and even tread wear / long-lasting durability

Cons

  • Notable road noise reported by some users
  • Stiff ride quality that can amplify road bumps
  • Reduced performance and grip in wet or cold conditions as tread wears down
All owner themes in the Kinergy Eco 2 review

Tire B BluEarth-GT AE51

Pros

  • Significantly reduced cabin noise and quiet highway cruising
  • Impressive ride comfort and plush absorption of road imperfections
  • Good dry handling and confident cornering grip

Cons

  • Polarizing wet-weather performance, with some users reporting poor traction or sliding on damp or wet roads
  • Firm or harsh ride reported on smaller sidewall/low-profile sizes when over-inflated
  • Occasional reports of accelerated tread wear or cracking prematurely
All owner themes in the BluEarth-GT AE51 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51 is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its low road noise, comfortable ride, and solid value for money. While several users highlight good wet and dry grip along with decent tread life over long ownership periods, a few drivers express reservations regarding heavy rain performance, visual appearance, and potential noise increase over time.

Top themes
#low road noise#ride comfort and softness#wet and dry grip#value for money#treadwear and longevity#warranty coverage#tire sidewall appearance

Based on 29 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 B · Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4878
Rim diameters13″ – 17″14″ – 20″
UTQG200 - 400 A - B A—
Sizes in common1616

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. Where the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51 scores 79 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51 scores 74 vs 53 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51 scores 68 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51 scores 75 vs 63 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kinergy Eco 2 or BluEarth-GT AE51?

Which is better in the wet, Kinergy Eco 2 or BluEarth-GT AE51?

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51, 70 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Kinergy Eco 2 or BluEarth-GT AE51?

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51, 75 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Kinergy Eco 2 or BluEarth-GT AE51?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Kinergy Eco 2 or BluEarth-GT AE51?

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51, 74 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Kinergy Eco 2 or BluEarth-GT AE51?

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51, 68 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Kinergy Eco 2 or BluEarth-GT AE51?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 77 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology