Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 vs Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 8 + 3 road tests and 1,068 + 1,918 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta Sport PS72 is ahead, 81–72

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Tire AKumho

Ecsta Sport PS72

Summer

± 6

Tests 78 · 8 tests Owners 83 · 1,068 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wet handling (tester's mark))

“I’m on the Kumho sport ps72 and in the dry on road they are great, wet road- great, dry track also great but on wet track; a little unpredictable.”

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51
Tire BYokohama

BluEarth-GT AE51

Summer

± 6

Tests 68 · 3 tests Owners 77 · 1,918 reviews

Best test result: #4 of 8 in 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

“Are the Yokohama BlueEarth GT AE51 all seasons tires or summer tires? After google searching it, some say it's summer tires other say it's all seasons. From the thread pattern on it, it looks like a summer tire. The shop owner told me it's all season tires. Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 86

    Dry

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +11
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72BluEarth-GT AE51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 3 tests8770
    Reviews found online8582

    Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 85.3 = 86

    BluEarth-GT AE51: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 81.7 = 75

  2. 88

    Wet

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +18
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72BluEarth-GT AE51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 3 tests8864
    Reviews found online8878

    Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 87.5 = 88

    BluEarth-GT AE51: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 78.2 = 70

  3. 68

    Comfort

    BluEarth-GT AE51 +6
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72BluEarth-GT AE51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests58≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7576

    Ecsta Sport PS72: 40% × 57.9 + 60% × 75.4 = 68

    BluEarth-GT AE51: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 76.3 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth-GT AE51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 64

    Noise

    BluEarth-GT AE51 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72BluEarth-GT AE51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 2 tests6371
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 64

    BluEarth-GT AE51: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta Sport PS72 or BluEarth-GT AE51. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 73

    Treadwear

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72BluEarth-GT AE51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7870

    Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 78 = 73

    BluEarth-GT AE51: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth-GT AE51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 86

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +7
    79
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72BluEarth-GT AE51
    Reviews found online8679
  7. 71

    Efficiency

    BluEarth-GT AE51 +6
    77
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72BluEarth-GT AE51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests7177
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 vs Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta Sport PS72Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51
Relative Score 81 72
Dry 86 75
Wet 88 70
Comfort 68 74
Noise 64 69
Treadwear 73 68
Handling (owners) 86 79
Efficiency 71 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Ecsta Sport PS72

± 6

BluEarth-GT AE51

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEcsta Sport PS72BluEarth-GT AE51ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% #9/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? 97% #4/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #3/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test 98% #10/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% #14/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test 96% #7/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 93% #4/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? 93% #5/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 99% #5/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test 99% #4/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #1/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test 99% #5/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 82% #12/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test 82% #5/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/10 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test #5/8 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta Sport PS72

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Strong and predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Quieter road noise and high ride comfort relative to other performance tires

Cons

  • Occasional reports of out-of-round tires causing persistent vibrations at highway speeds
  • Stiffer sidewalls can result in a firmer ride or slight tracking issues when cold
  • Some users noted faster-than-expected wear under aggressive, spirited driving conditions
All owner themes in the Ecsta Sport PS72 review

Tire B BluEarth-GT AE51

Pros

  • Significantly reduced cabin noise and quiet highway cruising
  • Impressive ride comfort and plush absorption of road imperfections
  • Good dry handling and confident cornering grip

Cons

  • Polarizing wet-weather performance, with some users reporting poor traction or sliding on damp or wet roads
  • Firm or harsh ride reported on smaller sidewall/low-profile sizes when over-inflated
  • Occasional reports of accelerated tread wear or cracking prematurely
All owner themes in the BluEarth-GT AE51 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 is largely positive, with drivers praising its impressive dry and wet grip, responsive handling, and low cabin noise compared to premium alternatives like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. Most owners view it as an outstanding value proposition, offering near-flagship performance at a significantly lower price point. Minor criticisms focus on potential treadwear longevity, lack of rim protection, mixed feedback on highway noise, and occasional wheel balance or vibration issues.

civicxi.com ·2026-01-19

“Anyone else running these tires? Is it possible the tire(s) out of round? New hypergram wheels/new tires w/ aluminum hubcentric rings. Has vibrations, but most noticed front right. Balanced again same thing. Took the hub rings off with significant decrease but still there. Will try again with plastic rings followed by swapping wheels front to rear. If still going on will have to live with it”

r/elektrischrijden ·1 upvote ·2026-09-02

“Ik heb nog een paar nieuwe banden liggen voor die maat. Continental PremiumContact 7. Had je voor heel weinig mogen hebben. Die zijn echt wel beter dan die Hankooks. Overigens hoeft een goede band niet heel duur te zijn. Ik was zelf niet tevreden mer Hankook. De laatste nieuwe banden die ik heb laten monteren waren Kumho's Ecsta sport PS72. Die zijn weliswaar goedkoop, maar komen uitstekend uit veel testen. Ze hebben ook echt meer grip dan de Hankooks en Vredesteins die ik hiervoor had.”

r/F30 ·6 upvotes ·2026-06-07

“Michelin PS5 vs Continental SC 7 vs Kumho PS72 for 437 wheels Looking for new tires for my F30 330i on 437M wheels (225/40R19 & 255/35R19). Main priorities are comfort, steering feel, low noise, and good grip for spirited driving. I’ve previously run Michelin PS5 and loved them, although they got a bit noisy over time. Now I’m deciding between: Michelin PS5 Continental SportContact 7 Kumho PS72 The Kumhos are much cheaper and reviews seem very positive. Are they really close to the PS5/SC7, or is it worth spending more?”

Top themes
#value for money#dry and wet grip#low road noise#Michelin PS4 comparison#balancing and vibration#ride comfort compliance#treadwear longevity

Based on 33 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51 is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its low road noise, comfortable ride, and solid value for money. While several users highlight good wet and dry grip along with decent tread life over long ownership periods, a few drivers express reservations regarding heavy rain performance, visual appearance, and potential noise increase over time.

r/CarsIndia ·5 upvotes ·2025-07-29

“3 years with Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51, underrated tyre Got BluEarth GT AE51 during Aug 2022, and liking them so far. They were a replacement for Yokohama Earth-1s, which had also served me well. Pros : Soft ride Less noise VFM , same price as Earth -1. 2 ply side wall. improved FE Grippy and confidence inspiring even in rains. Cons : Softer compound, so may not last too much compared to a hard compound tyre. Dealers may not be interested in pushing it compared to E1, for some strange reason. Tread pattern appears non-aggressive, compared to say, the Yoko S drive. Purely aesthetic only. Not a popular tyre, akin to spotting a unicorn. Directional tyres, need to pay attention if mounting/dismounting for whatever reason. Given a choice, I would definitely buy them again any day of the week and twice on Sunday. I have taken them on terrible jaggedy roads and continue to do so every day thanks to bad stretches roads in my city. Pic is representative only, got it from the internet. My tyre size is 185/70R14. 3 years, but logged only 12k+ KMs on it so far thanks to another car at my disposal. Balanced and rotated once, due again now again but holding off due to low running. Read more”

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2026-08-31

“Mazda 3 2019 hatchback tire recommendations Car: Mazda 3 2019 model hatchback Current tyres: Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51 I’ve had my car since 2019 and have done 80,000km on these tires. My mechanic told me I have about 2–3,000km left before they are no longer roadworthy by my state’s standards. I’ve had the same tyres the entire time and I’m really happy with how long they’ve lasted. I’ve always felt they could handle heavy rain better. My tyre guy can supply and install the same tyres for $750AUD. Happy to spend up to $900. I’m mainly looking for good longevity, decent cabin noise and good wet weather performance. I mostly do highway driving with suburban use, once a week on rural/country roads. My area gets pretty heavy rain but no other weather conditions. Essentially, I’m looking for a good all round summer tyre rather than a dedicated performance tyre. Before I purchase them again, are there any other tyres you guys would recommend? Read more”

r/PakistanAutoHub ·1 upvote ·2026-06-29

“You won't be able to tell difference in ride and noise when driving any difference you can tell is just placebo. I shifted to AE51 GT from worn OEM Es31 no significant differences”

Top themes
#low road noise#ride comfort and softness#wet and dry grip#value for money#treadwear and longevity#warranty coverage#tire sidewall appearance

Based on 29 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 B · Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available5078
Rim diameters17″ – 21″14″ – 20″
Tread depth9.4/32″—
UTQG320 A A—
Treadwear warranty30,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common3232

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51

Winner: Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51 if comfort, efficiency and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 88 vs 70 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 86 vs 75 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 86 vs 79 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51 scores 74 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta Sport PS72 or BluEarth-GT AE51?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta Sport PS72 or BluEarth-GT AE51?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 88 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta Sport PS72 or BluEarth-GT AE51?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 86 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ecsta Sport PS72 or BluEarth-GT AE51?

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51, 69 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta Sport PS72 or BluEarth-GT AE51?

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51, 74 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta Sport PS72 or BluEarth-GT AE51?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 73 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Ecsta Sport PS72 or BluEarth-GT AE51?

Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51, 77 vs 71 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology