Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Kinergy PT H737 vs Kumho Solus TA51 plus — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 446 + 0 owner reviews. How we score

Kinergy PT H737 leads, 74–70 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy PT H737
Tire AHankook

Kinergy PT H737

All-Season tire

± 8

Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 446 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I have those on my mazda now. They ride well and wet traction is good. Going on my elantra this fall.”

Kumho Solus TA51 plus
Tire BKumho

Solus TA51 plus

All-Season tire

± 9

Tests 71 · 2 tests Owners – · none yet

Best test result: #2 of 9 in Is Expensive Better? 2026 AutoView Korean All-Season Tyre Test (dry circle speed)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Kinergy PT H737 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy PT H737Solus TA51 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 71 (est.)70
    Reviews found online76≈ 69 (est.)

    Kinergy PT H737: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73

    Solus TA51 plus: 60% × 69.6 + 40% × 68.6 (est.) = 69

    No road tests of dry for Kinergy PT H737. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No owner ratings of dry for Solus TA51 plus. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Kinergy PT H737 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy PT H737Solus TA51 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 75 (est.)71
    Reviews found online79≈ 71 (est.)

    Kinergy PT H737: 60% × 75.3 (est.) + 40% × 79 = 77

    Solus TA51 plus: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 70.9 (est.) = 71

    No road tests of wet for Kinergy PT H737. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No owner ratings of wet for Solus TA51 plus. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Comfort

    Kinergy PT H737 +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy PT H737Solus TA51 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 69 (est.)68
    Reviews found online72≈ 69 (est.)

    Kinergy PT H737: 40% × 69.4 (est.) + 60% × 72.3 = 71

    Solus TA51 plus: 40% × 68 + 60% × 68.5 (est.) = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy PT H737. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No owner ratings of comfort for Solus TA51 plus. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 69

    Noise

    Solus TA51 plus +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy PT H737Solus TA51 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 66 (est.)75
    Reviews found online72≈ 66 (est.)

    Kinergy PT H737: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 69

    Solus TA51 plus: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 71

    No road tests of noise for Kinergy PT H737. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Solus TA51 plus. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 77

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy PT H737Solus TA51 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76–
    Reviews found online78–

    Kinergy PT H737: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 78.3 = 77

  6. 70

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy PT H737Solus TA51 plus
    Reviews found online70–
Scores at a glance
Hankook Kinergy PT H737 vs Kumho Solus TA51 plus: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Kinergy PT H737Kumho Solus TA51 plus
Relative Score 74 70
Dry 73 69
Wet 77 71
Comfort 71 68
Noise 69 71
Treadwear 77 –
Handling (owners) 70 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Kinergy PT H737

± 9

Solus TA51 plus

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryKinergy PT H737Solus TA51 plusΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/8 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires #1/5 2026 AutoView Mid-Range Comfort Tyre Test – Different tests

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Kinergy PT H737

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Hankook Kinergy PT H737 is consistently positive, with users frequently praising its impressive tread life, comfortable ride, and solid fuel economy. Owners highlight strong everyday commuting performance in wet and dry conditions, noting it as a high-value purchase, though some suggest it is not meant for aggressive driving in heavy rain. Several consumers are prospective buyers attracted by promotional pricing and the 90,000-mile tread warranty.

Top themes
#long tread life#quiet and comfortable ride#fuel efficiency#good wet and dry traction#value and pricing#commuting performance

Based on 14 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Solus TA51 plus

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Kinergy PT H737 B · Kumho Solus TA51 plus
CategoryAll-Season tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available622
Rim diameters15″ – 19″17″ – 19″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG800 A A—
Treadwear warranty75,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Kinergy PT H737

Kumho Solus TA51 plus

Narrow edge: Hankook Kinergy PT H737 — better wet, dry and comfort. Where the Kumho Solus TA51 plus is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy PT H737 scores 77 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Kinergy PT H737 scores 73 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Kinergy PT H737 scores 71 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Kinergy PT H737
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA51 plus

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kinergy PT H737 or Solus TA51 plus?

Which is better in the wet, Kinergy PT H737 or Solus TA51 plus?

Hankook Kinergy PT H737, 77 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Kinergy PT H737 or Solus TA51 plus?

Hankook Kinergy PT H737, 73 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Kinergy PT H737 or Solus TA51 plus?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Kinergy PT H737 or Solus TA51 plus?

Hankook Kinergy PT H737, 71 vs 68 on our comfort score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology