Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Optimo H426 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 24 + 115 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV is ahead, 67–49

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Optimo H426
Tire AHankook

Optimo H426

All Season

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 24 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 51

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV +16
    67
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H426Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4266

    Optimo H426: 60% × 57.3 (est.) + 40% × 42.4 = 51

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 54

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV +17
    71
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H426Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online4971

    Optimo H426: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 48.5 = 54

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 71

    No road tests of wet for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 49

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H426Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)–
    Reviews found online35–

    Optimo H426: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 35.3 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 44

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV +21
    65
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H426Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online3162

    Optimo H426: 40% × 62.2 (est.) + 60% × 31.3 = 44

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.4 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Optimo H426 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 60

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H426Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online51–

    Optimo H426: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 60

    No road tests of noise for Optimo H426. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 47

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV +13
    60
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H426Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online3556

    Optimo H426: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.1 = 47

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56.2 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 36

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV +30
    66
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H426Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
    Reviews found online3666
Scores at a glance
Hankook Optimo H426 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Optimo H426Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
Relative Score 49 67
Dry 51 67
Wet 54 71
Snow 49 –
Comfort 44 65
Noise 60 –
Treadwear 47 60
Handling (owners) 36 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Optimo H426

± 8

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Optimo H426

Pros

  • Reliable dry and wet traction in moderate weather
  • Comfortable and smooth initial ride quality
  • Confident handling and cornering capabilities

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear in the latter half of the tire's life span
  • Subpar performance and loss of grip in cold temperatures or snow
  • Increased road noise as the tires age
All owner themes in the Optimo H426 review

Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with strong confidence during heavy rain
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality with minimal road noise
  • Precise steering response with no tramlining on uneven surfaces

Cons

  • High initial cost mentioned by some users
  • Potentially faster tread wear depending on driving habits
  • Slightly noisy initially until the tires are properly worn in
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Optimo H426 B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
CategoryAll SeasonSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available117
Rim diameters15″ – 20″19″ – 21″
Tread depth10/32″9 - 10/32″
UTQG440 A A240 A - AA A
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallRaised Black Lettering
Max pressure44 psi50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Optimo H426

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV scores 66 vs 36 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV scores 65 vs 44 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV scores 71 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV scores 67 vs 51 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Optimo H426
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Optimo H426 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Optimo H426 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV, 71 vs 54 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo H426 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV, 67 vs 51 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Optimo H426 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV, 65 vs 44 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Optimo H426 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV, 60 vs 47 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology