tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 117 + 8,204 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PS71 is ahead, 73–68

Check price on Amazon · Ecsta PS71 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire BKumho

Ecsta PS71

Summer

± 5

Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,204 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Ecsta PS71 +7
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 68 (est.)78
    Reviews found online6872

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.6 + 40% × 71.8 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Ecsta PS71 +13
    85
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 72 (est.)92
    Reviews found online7375

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 91.9 + 40% × 74.6 = 85

    No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS71 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 68 (est.)75
    Reviews found online6465

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.5 = 65

    Ecsta PS71: 40% × 74.6 + 60% × 65.2 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    36
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests–16
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 36

    No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 64

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV +12
    52
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 65 (est.)46
    Reviews found online6260

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 62 = 64

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 46 + 40% × 59.9 = 52

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PS71 +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVEcsta PS71
    Reviews found online6873
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    48
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests–48
Scores at a glance
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVKumho Ecsta PS71
Relative Score 68 73
Dry 68 75
Wet 72 85
Comfort 65 69
Noise – 36
Treadwear 64 52
Handling (owners) 68 73
Efficiency – 48

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV

± 5

Ecsta PS71

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVEcsta PS71ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #6/7 2016 Autobild 4x4 / SUV Tyre Test #4/52 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with strong confidence during heavy rain
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality with minimal road noise
  • Precise steering response with no tramlining on uneven surfaces

Cons

  • High initial cost mentioned by some users
  • Potentially faster tread wear depending on driving habits
  • Slightly noisy initially until the tires are properly worn in
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV review

Tire B Ecsta PS71

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
  • Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS71 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Positive

Community members generally view the Kumho Ecsta PS71 as a capable and reliable mid-range ultra-high performance tire offering solid grip and value for money compared to premium alternatives. While perceived as good once warmed up, some drivers note that it does not quite reach the ultimate grip level of top-tier brands and question its tread wear longevity.

r/tires ·5 upvotes ·2022-10-17

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2024-10-25

“I've had the PS71 several years ago - it was ok, nothing spectacular. They might have changed the compound now, so it may be better. Its a good tire, I don't remember any real weaknesses, it just never felt like "yeah, this sticks like glue to the road". Edit: I just remembered - it was mediocre in the city - when the tire was not warmed up, but I reckon this is shared between most sport tires with high speed rating. Once warmed up was good.”
bimmerforums.co.uk ·1 upvote ·2024-05-05

“On Blackcircles all the 245/40 R19 ditch finders cost around £100 and have a poor wet grip & all the decent mid range cost around £170 and have A rated wet grip. Would you risk it for £240? I know I wouldn't. The cheapest A wet rated is a Kuhmo Ecsta PS71 at £136 if you really want to keep the cost down. If you want a relatively soft comfortable tyre then a Hankook S1 Evo 3 is an excellent choice.”
Top themes
#value for money#wet and dry grip#tire wear longevity#sporty handling performance#warm up temperature behavior#mid-range alternative comparison

Based on 23 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV B · Kumho Ecsta PS71
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7133
Rim diameters19″ – 21″16″ – 22″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG240 A - AA A—
SidewallRaised Black LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common66

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 85 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV scores 64 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 75 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS71
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or Ecsta PS71?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 85 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 75 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or Ecsta PS71?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV, 64 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology