Tests – · none yet Owners 42 · 24 reviews
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Optimo H426 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 24 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth is ahead, 61–52
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 12 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +861Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 45 58 Optimo H426: 60% × 58.7 (est.) + 40% × 45.3 = 53
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61
No road tests of dry for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
56
Wet
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +157Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 50 53 Optimo H426: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 56
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57
No road tests of wet for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
47
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) – Reviews found online 32 – Optimo H426: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 32 = 47
No road tests of snow for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
51
Comfort
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +1465Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 34 62 Optimo H426: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 33.5 = 51
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Optimo H426 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 50 – Optimo H426: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 49.7 = 60
No road tests of noise for Optimo H426. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
50
Treadwear
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +1565Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 39 64 Optimo H426: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 38.8 = 50
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
40
Handling (owners)
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +1858Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Reviews found online 40 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo H426 | Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 52 | 61 |
| Dry | 53 | 61 |
| Wet | 56 | 57 |
| Snow | 47 | – |
| Comfort | 51 | 65 |
| Noise | 60 | – |
| Treadwear | 50 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 40 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Optimo H426
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Optimo H426
Pros
- Reliable dry and wet traction in moderate weather
- Comfortable and smooth initial ride quality
- Confident handling and cornering capabilities
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear in the latter half of the tire's life span
- Subpar performance and loss of grip in cold temperatures or snow
- Increased road noise as the tires age
Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Pros
- Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Adequate dry road grip and handling
Cons
- Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
- Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
- Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo H426 | B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 11 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 440 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Optimo H426
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 58 vs 40 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 65 vs 50 on treadwear.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 65 vs 51 on comfort.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 61 vs 53 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Optimo H426 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Which is better in the wet, Optimo H426 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 57 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo H426 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 61 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Optimo H426 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 65 vs 51 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Optimo H426 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 65 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology