Hankook Optimo H428 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Optimo H428 vs Kumho Ecsta PS31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 3 + 259 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Optimo H428
Tire AHankook

Optimo H428

All-Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 3 reviews (needs 5)

Kumho Ecsta PS31
Tire BKumho

Ecsta PS31

Summer

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 259 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H428Ecsta PS31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online–60

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H428Ecsta PS31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online–68

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H428Ecsta PS31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–50

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H428Ecsta PS31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online–65

    Ecsta PS31: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 64.6 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PS31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H428Ecsta PS31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–67

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Ecsta PS31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H428Ecsta PS31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–65

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H428Ecsta PS31
    Reviews found online–69
Scores at a glance
Hankook Optimo H428 vs Kumho Ecsta PS31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Optimo H428Kumho Ecsta PS31
Relative Score – 65
Dry – 63
Wet – 69
Snow – 58
Comfort – 66
Noise – 67
Treadwear – 65
Handling (owners) – 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Optimo H428

± 7

Ecsta PS31

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Optimo H428

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Ecsta PS31

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
  • Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS31 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Optimo H428 B · Kumho Ecsta PS31
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available221
Rim diameters15″ – 17″15″ – 18″
Tread depth9.5/32″10/32″
UTQG500 A A460 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Optimo H428

Kumho Ecsta PS31

Only Kumho Ecsta PS31 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Hankook Optimo H428
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS31

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology