Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews
Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Optimo H725A looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Optimo H725 vs Hankook Optimo H725A — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 4 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Optimo H725 55, Optimo H725A 54.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
Level53Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Optimo H725A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 45 45 Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
Optimo H725A: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
57
Wet
Optimo H725 +453Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Optimo H725A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 52 47 Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57
Optimo H725A: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.1 = 53
No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
55
Snow
Optimo H725 +253Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Optimo H725A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 46 42 Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
Optimo H725A: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 41.8 = 53
No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
54
Comfort
Optimo H725A +256Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Optimo H725A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 40 43 Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54
Optimo H725A: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 56
No road tests of comfort for Optimo H725 or Optimo H725A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
Level61Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Optimo H725A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 52 50 Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61
Optimo H725A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 61
No road tests of noise for Optimo H725 or Optimo H725A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
Optimo H725A +258Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Optimo H725A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 49 52 Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56
Optimo H725A: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
46
Handling (owners)
Level46Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Optimo H725A Reviews found online 46 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo H725 | Hankook Optimo H725A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 54 |
| Dry | 53 | 53 |
| Wet | 57 | 53 |
| Snow | 55 | 53 |
| Comfort | 54 | 56 |
| Noise | 61 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 46 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Optimo H725
Optimo H725A
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo H725 | B · Hankook Optimo H725A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 10.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 700 A B | 340 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Optimo H725
Hankook Optimo H725A
Too close to call: Hankook Optimo H725 and Hankook Optimo H725A are within 2 points overall. Hankook Optimo H725 is stronger on wet. Hankook Optimo H725A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Optimo H725 scores 57 vs 53 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Optimo H725 or Optimo H725A?
Which is better in the wet, Optimo H725 or Optimo H725A?
Hankook Optimo H725, 57 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo H725 or Optimo H725A?
Neither, by our numbers: 53 vs 53 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Optimo H725 or Optimo H725A?
Neither, by our numbers: 55 vs 53 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Optimo H725 or Optimo H725A?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 61 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Optimo H725 or Optimo H725A?
Neither, by our numbers: 54 vs 56 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Optimo H725 or Optimo H725A?
Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 58 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology