Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 78 reviews
Hankook Optimo H725A looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Kumho Solus TA31 vs Hankook Optimo H725A — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 78 + 4 owner reviews. How we score
Solus TA31 leads, 58–54 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
58
Dry
Solus TA31 +553Why this score
Source Solus TA31 Optimo H725A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 52 45 Solus TA31: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 58
Optimo H725A: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
No road tests of dry for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
60
Wet
Solus TA31 +753Why this score
Source Solus TA31 Optimo H725A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 57 47 Solus TA31: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 56.8 = 60
Optimo H725A: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.1 = 53
No road tests of wet for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
53
Snow
Level53Why this score
Source Solus TA31 Optimo H725A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 41 42 Solus TA31: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.1 = 53
Optimo H725A: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 41.8 = 53
No road tests of snow for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
62
Comfort
Solus TA31 +656Why this score
Source Solus TA31 Optimo H725A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 55 43 Solus TA31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 62
Optimo H725A: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 56
No road tests of comfort for Solus TA31 or Optimo H725A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Noise
Solus TA31 +461Why this score
Source Solus TA31 Optimo H725A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 61 50 Solus TA31: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.6 = 65
Optimo H725A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 61
No road tests of noise for Solus TA31 or Optimo H725A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
57
Treadwear
Optimo H725A +158Why this score
Source Solus TA31 Optimo H725A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 52 52 Solus TA31: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 57
Optimo H725A: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
51
Handling (owners)
Solus TA31 +546Why this score
Source Solus TA31 Optimo H725A Reviews found online 51 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus TA31 | Hankook Optimo H725A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 54 |
| Dry | 58 | 53 |
| Wet | 60 | 53 |
| Snow | 53 | 53 |
| Comfort | 62 | 56 |
| Noise | 65 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Solus TA31
Optimo H725A
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Solus TA31
Pros
- Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
- Very low road noise and a comfortable, smooth ride
- Good dry and wet traction for everyday commuting
Cons
- Poor performance in snow and ice conditions
- Soft sidewalls leading to reduced high-speed stability and less sharp handling
- Inconsistent tread wear reported by some users, leading to premature replacement
Tire B Optimo H725A
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus TA31 | B · Hankook Optimo H725A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 22 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9.5/32″ | 10.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 500 A A | 340 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Solus TA31
Hankook Optimo H725A
Narrow edge: Kumho Solus TA31 — better wet, comfort and dry. Where the Hankook Optimo H725A is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Hankook Optimo H725A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Kumho Solus TA31 scores 60 vs 53 on wet.
Kumho Solus TA31 scores 62 vs 56 on comfort.
Kumho Solus TA31 scores 58 vs 53 on dry.
Kumho Solus TA31 scores 65 vs 61 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Solus TA31 or Optimo H725A?
Which is better in the wet, Solus TA31 or Optimo H725A?
Kumho Solus TA31, 60 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Solus TA31 or Optimo H725A?
Kumho Solus TA31, 58 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Solus TA31 or Optimo H725A?
Neither, by our numbers: 53 vs 53 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Solus TA31 or Optimo H725A?
Kumho Solus TA31, 65 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Solus TA31 or Optimo H725A?
Kumho Solus TA31, 62 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Solus TA31 or Optimo H725A?
Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 58 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology