Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 4 reviews
Hankook Optimo H725A looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Optimo H725A vs Michelin Defender T+H — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 4 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Defender T+H is ahead, 71–54
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 71 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
Defender T+H +1972Why this score
Source Optimo H725A Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 45 74 Optimo H725A: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
Defender T+H: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72
No road tests of dry for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
53
Wet
Defender T+H +2174Why this score
Source Optimo H725A Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 47 75 Optimo H725A: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.1 = 53
Defender T+H: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 74
No road tests of wet for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
53
Snow
Defender T+H +1366Why this score
Source Optimo H725A Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 42 63 Optimo H725A: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 41.8 = 53
Defender T+H: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66
No road tests of snow for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
56
Comfort
Defender T+H +1470Why this score
Source Optimo H725A Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 43 70 Optimo H725A: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 56
Defender T+H: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Optimo H725A or Defender T+H. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
Defender T+H +869Why this score
Source Optimo H725A Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 50 71 Optimo H725A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 61
Defender T+H: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 69
No road tests of noise for Optimo H725A or Defender T+H. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Treadwear
Defender T+H +1573Why this score
Source Optimo H725A Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 52 70 Optimo H725A: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 58
Defender T+H: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 70 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
46
Handling (owners)
Defender T+H +2672Why this score
Source Optimo H725A Defender T+H Reviews found online 46 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo H725A | Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 54 | 71 |
| Dry | 53 | 72 |
| Wet | 53 | 74 |
| Snow | 53 | 66 |
| Comfort | 56 | 70 |
| Noise | 61 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 46 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
54
/ 100
Optimo H725A
71
/ 100
Defender T+H
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo H725A | B · Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10.5/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 340 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
54
/ 100
Hankook Optimo H725A
71
/ 100
Michelin Defender T+H
Winner: Michelin Defender T+H — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Optimo H725A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Defender T+H rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Defender T+H scores 72 vs 46 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Defender T+H scores 74 vs 53 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Defender T+H scores 72 vs 53 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 58 on treadwear.
Tire A · Hankook Optimo H725A
Tire B · Michelin Defender T+H
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Optimo H725A or Defender T+H?
Which is better in the wet, Optimo H725A or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 74 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo H725A or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 72 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Optimo H725A or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 66 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Optimo H725A or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 69 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Optimo H725A or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 70 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Optimo H725A or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology