Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews
Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Optimo H725 vs Vredestein Hi Trac — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Hi Trac is ahead, 73–54
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
Hi Trac +2073Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Hi Trac Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 45 77 Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
Hi Trac: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73
No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Hi Trac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
57
Wet
Hi Trac +2077Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Hi Trac Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 52 79 Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57
Hi Trac: 60% × 75.1 (est.) + 40% × 79.3 = 77
No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Hi Trac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
55
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Hi Trac Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) – Reviews found online 46 – Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
54
Comfort
Hi Trac +1670Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Hi Trac Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 40 70 Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54
Hi Trac: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Optimo H725 or Hi Trac. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Hi Trac Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 52 – Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61
No road tests of noise for Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
Hi Trac +1268Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Hi Trac Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 49 70 Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56
Hi Trac: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Hi Trac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
46
Handling (owners)
Hi Trac +2672Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Hi Trac Reviews found online 46 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo H725 | Vredestein Hi Trac |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 54 | 73 |
| Dry | 53 | 73 |
| Wet | 57 | 77 |
| Snow | 55 | – |
| Comfort | 54 | 70 |
| Noise | 61 | – |
| Treadwear | 56 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 46 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Optimo H725
Hi Trac
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Optimo H725
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Hi Trac
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and safety
- High tread longevity and durability
- Strong value for money
Cons
- Increased road noise at higher speeds
- Sensitivity to uneven road surfaces or ruts
- Limited performance on non-asphalt surfaces
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo H725 | B · Vredestein Hi Trac |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 A B | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Optimo H725
Vredestein Hi Trac
Winner: Vredestein Hi Trac — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Vredestein Hi Trac rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Vredestein Hi Trac scores 72 vs 46 on handling.
Vredestein Hi Trac scores 73 vs 53 on dry.
Vredestein Hi Trac scores 77 vs 57 on wet.
Vredestein Hi Trac scores 70 vs 54 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Optimo H725 or Hi Trac?
Which is better in the wet, Optimo H725 or Hi Trac?
Vredestein Hi Trac, 77 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo H725 or Hi Trac?
Vredestein Hi Trac, 73 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Optimo H725 or Hi Trac?
Vredestein Hi Trac, 70 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Optimo H725 or Hi Trac?
Vredestein Hi Trac, 68 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology