Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews
Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Optimo H725 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 36 + 588 owner reviews. How we score
Quatrac Pro is ahead, 72–55
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 74 · 588 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
Quatrac Pro +2174Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 45 75 Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 75.1 = 74
No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
57
Wet
Quatrac Pro +2683Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 52 80 Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 84.2 + 40% × 80 = 83
No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
55
Snow
Level55Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 48 Reviews found online 46 66 Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 48.4 + 40% × 65.8 = 55
No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
54
Comfort
Quatrac Pro +2175Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 40 77 Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 77.2 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
Quatrac Pro +1475Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 52 74 Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 73.6 = 75
No road tests of noise for Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
Quatrac Pro +561Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 55 Reviews found online 49 69 Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 54.9 + 40% × 69.2 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
46
Handling (owners)
Quatrac Pro +2874Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Quatrac Pro Reviews found online 46 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo H725 | Vredestein Quatrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 72 |
| Dry | 53 | 74 |
| Wet | 57 | 83 |
| Snow | 55 | 55 |
| Comfort | 54 | 75 |
| Noise | 61 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 46 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
55
/ 100
Optimo H725
72
/ 100
Quatrac Pro
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Optimo H725
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Quatrac Pro
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance with high resistance to aquaplaning
- Remarkably low road noise and high ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires
- Strong and predictable grip in cold, rainy, and mild winter conditions
Cons
- Reduced fuel economy or slight negative impact on range reported by some users
- Mixed feedback on durability, with a few drivers experiencing faster-than-expected tread wear or manufacturing defects
- Subpar performance in heavy snow or packed ice compared to dedicated winter tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo H725 | B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 97 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 A B | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
55
/ 100
Hankook Optimo H725
72
/ 100
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Winner: Vredestein Quatrac Pro — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 74 vs 46 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 83 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 74 vs 53 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 75 vs 54 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook Optimo H725
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Optimo H725 or Quatrac Pro?
Which is better in the wet, Optimo H725 or Quatrac Pro?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 83 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo H725 or Quatrac Pro?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 74 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Optimo H725 or Quatrac Pro?
Neither, by our numbers: 55 vs 55 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Optimo H725 or Quatrac Pro?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 75 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Optimo H725 or Quatrac Pro?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 75 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Optimo H725 or Quatrac Pro?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 61 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology