Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 9 reviews
Hankook Optimo K406 vs Toyo Proxes Comfort — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 15 road tests and 9 + 631 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes Comfort is ahead, 79–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 15 tests Owners 79 · 631 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Proxes Comfort +1483Why this score
Source Optimo K406 Proxes Comfort Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 86 Reviews found online 70 79 Optimo K406: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 69
Proxes Comfort: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 78.5 = 83
No road tests of dry for Optimo K406. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
71
Wet
Proxes Comfort +1081Why this score
Source Optimo K406 Proxes Comfort Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 71 83 Optimo K406: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 71
Proxes Comfort: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 82.7 = 81
No road tests of wet for Optimo K406. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Comfort
Proxes Comfort +1071Why this score
Source Optimo K406 Proxes Comfort Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 59 Reviews found online 57 78 Optimo K406: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 57.3 = 61
Proxes Comfort: 40% × 59.2 + 60% × 78.1 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Optimo K406. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison71Why this score
Source Optimo K406 Proxes Comfort Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 74 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Proxes Comfort: 60% × 74 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 71
No owner ratings of noise for Proxes Comfort. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
59
Treadwear
Proxes Comfort +1372Why this score
Source Optimo K406 Proxes Comfort Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 55 77 Optimo K406: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.1 = 59
Proxes Comfort: 60% × 67.9 + 40% × 77.2 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo K406. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
58
Handling (owners)
Proxes Comfort +1977Why this score
Source Optimo K406 Proxes Comfort Reviews found online 58 77 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison60Why this score
Source Optimo K406 Proxes Comfort Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests – 60
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo K406 | Toyo Proxes Comfort |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 79 |
| Dry | 69 | 83 |
| Wet | 71 | 81 |
| Comfort | 61 | 71 |
| Noise | – | 71 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 77 |
| Efficiency | – | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Optimo K406
Proxes Comfort
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Optimo K406
Pros
- Reliable dry-weather grip and handling performance
- Competitive value proposition as an entry-level or OE option
- Potential for high mileage in specific, low-stress driving conditions
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life with reports of premature wear
- Noticeable road noise during highway driving
- Susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and structural damage
Tire B Proxes Comfort
Pros
- Excellent wet weather grip and handling
- Low road noise and quiet operation
- Strong value for money and affordable pricing
Cons
- Limited feedback and slight understeer when pushed hard
- Some drivers experienced a firmer or less comfortable ride over bumps
- Faster wear reported compared to premium long-lasting alternatives like Michelin
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo K406 | B · Toyo Proxes Comfort |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 63 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 14″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Optimo K406
Toyo Proxes Comfort
Winner: Toyo Proxes Comfort — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Optimo K406 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo Proxes Comfort scores 77 vs 58 on handling.
Toyo Proxes Comfort scores 83 vs 69 on dry.
Toyo Proxes Comfort scores 72 vs 59 on treadwear.
Toyo Proxes Comfort scores 81 vs 71 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Optimo K406 or Proxes Comfort?
Which is better in the wet, Optimo K406 or Proxes Comfort?
Toyo Proxes Comfort, 81 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo K406 or Proxes Comfort?
Toyo Proxes Comfort, 83 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Optimo K406 or Proxes Comfort?
Toyo Proxes Comfort, 71 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Optimo K406 or Proxes Comfort?
Toyo Proxes Comfort, 72 vs 59 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology