Head-to-head Updated

Hankook OPTIMO K715 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–60

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO K715BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online5770
  2. 63

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +9
    72
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO K715BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6173
  3. 66

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO K715BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6374
  4. 56

    Treadwear

    BluEarth Es ES32 +9
    65
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO K715BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online4965
  5. 54

    Handling

    BluEarth Es ES32 +19
    73
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO K715BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online5473
Scores at a glance
Hankook OPTIMO K715 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook OPTIMO K715Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 60 70
Dry 61 69
Wet 63 72
Comfort 66 72
Treadwear 56 65
Handling 54 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

OPTIMO K715

BluEarth Es ES32

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A OPTIMO K715

Pros

  • Reliable grip in both wet and dry road conditions
  • Satisfactory tread life for light-duty compact vehicles
  • Unexpectedly capable performance in light snow conditions

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread wear performance across different driving styles
  • Reports of premature sidewall cracking or structural degradation
  • Underwhelming performance characteristics for some compact car owners
All owner themes in the OPTIMO K715 review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook OPTIMO K715 B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1364
Rim diameters13″ – 15″13″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook OPTIMO K715

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 63 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 65 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 69 vs 61 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook OPTIMO K715
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Leads

BluEarth Es ES32

Amazon