Hankook Ventus AS RH07 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Michelin Cross Terrain looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus AS RH07 vs Michelin Cross Terrain — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

Cross Terrain is ahead, 72–43

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus AS RH07
Tire AHankook

Ventus AS RH07

All-Season tire

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 31 · 12 reviews

Michelin Cross Terrain
Tire BMichelin

Cross Terrain

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 3 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 43

    Dry

    Cross Terrain +27
    70
    Why this score
    SourceVentus AS RH07Cross Terrain
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 52 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online2971

    Ventus AS RH07: 60% × 52.1 (est.) + 40% × 28.9 = 43

    Cross Terrain: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Ventus AS RH07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Cross Terrain. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 44

    Wet

    Cross Terrain +30
    74
    Why this score
    SourceVentus AS RH07Cross Terrain
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 50 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online3575

    Ventus AS RH07: 60% × 50.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.1 = 44

    Cross Terrain: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Ventus AS RH07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Cross Terrain. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 48

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVentus AS RH07Cross Terrain
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)–
    Reviews found online33–

    Ventus AS RH07: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 32.5 = 48

    No road tests of snow for Ventus AS RH07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 46

    Comfort

    Cross Terrain +24
    70
    Why this score
    SourceVentus AS RH07Cross Terrain
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online2370

    Ventus AS RH07: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 22.8 = 46

    Cross Terrain: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus AS RH07 or Cross Terrain. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 51

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVentus AS RH07Cross Terrain
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online26–

    Ventus AS RH07: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 26 = 51

    No road tests of noise for Ventus AS RH07. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 46

    Treadwear

    Cross Terrain +27
    73
    Why this score
    SourceVentus AS RH07Cross Terrain
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online3178

    Ventus AS RH07: 60% × 55.1 (est.) + 40% × 31.4 = 46

    Cross Terrain: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus AS RH07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Cross Terrain. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 32

    Handling (owners)

    Cross Terrain +39
    71
    Why this score
    SourceVentus AS RH07Cross Terrain
    Reviews found online3271
Scores at a glance
Hankook Ventus AS RH07 vs Michelin Cross Terrain: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus AS RH07Michelin Cross Terrain
Relative Score 43 72
Dry 43 70
Wet 44 74
Snow 48 –
Comfort 46 70
Noise 51 –
Treadwear 46 73
Handling (owners) 32 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ventus AS RH07

Cross Terrain

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus AS RH07

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Cross Terrain

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and overall mileage
  • Superior quietness and ride comfort
  • Reliable grip and performance in winter conditions

Cons

  • Limited performance capabilities for high-speed or aggressive driving
  • Discontinued product availability
  • Performance bias favors winter conditions over dry or wet handling
All owner themes in the Cross Terrain review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus AS RH07 B · Michelin Cross Terrain
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG420 A A—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus AS RH07

Michelin Cross Terrain

Winner: Michelin Cross Terrain — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Ventus AS RH07 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Cross Terrain rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Cross Terrain scores 71 vs 32 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Cross Terrain scores 74 vs 44 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Cross Terrain scores 70 vs 43 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Cross Terrain scores 73 vs 46 on treadwear.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus AS RH07
Tire B · Michelin Cross Terrain

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus AS RH07 or Cross Terrain?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus AS RH07 or Cross Terrain?

Michelin Cross Terrain, 74 vs 44 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus AS RH07 or Cross Terrain?

Michelin Cross Terrain, 70 vs 43 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus AS RH07 or Cross Terrain?

Michelin Cross Terrain, 70 vs 46 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus AS RH07 or Cross Terrain?

Michelin Cross Terrain, 73 vs 46 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology