Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,521 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Aim for rainy condition. Best are 1.Bridgestone Turanza 005 2.Hankook ventus prime 4.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecowing ES31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 2,521 + 9,931 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 76–63
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 9,931 reviews
“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
79
Dry
Ventus Prime 4 +1564Why this score
Source Ventus Prime 4 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests 83 ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 73 62 Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73 = 79
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64
No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
77
Wet
Ventus Prime 4 +1463Why this score
Source Ventus Prime 4 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests 79 ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 75 60 Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.5 = 77
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63
No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
Ventus Prime 4 +663Why this score
Source Ventus Prime 4 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 67 61 Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.4 = 69
Ecowing ES31: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.8 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
61
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ventus Prime 4 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests 58 – Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) – Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
74
Treadwear
Ventus Prime 4 +866Why this score
Source Ventus Prime 4 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests 79 ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 67 65 Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
72
Handling (owners)
Ventus Prime 4 +1755Why this score
Source Ventus Prime 4 Ecowing ES31 Reviews found online 72 55 -
84
Efficiency
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ventus Prime 4 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests 84 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 63 |
| Dry | 79 | 64 |
| Wet | 77 | 63 |
| Comfort | 69 | 63 |
| Noise | 61 | – |
| Treadwear | 74 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 55 |
| Efficiency | 84 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
63
/ 100
Ecowing ES31
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ventus Prime 4 | Ecowing ES31 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/16 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | #9/18 2022 ADAC 16" SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
Tire B Ecowing ES31
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium brand alternatives
- Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort over bumps and speed humps
- Improved fuel economy and reduced rolling resistance
Cons
- Polarizing wet weather performance, with some users reporting frightening losses of traction
- Soft sidewalls that can feel vague during quick lane changes or lead to vulnerability against curbs and potholes
- Occasional reports of accelerated or uneven tread wear on outer shoulders
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
r/TireQuestions
·1 upvote ·2026-10-09
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and I found a cut/split. It’s holding air fine but it is cooked?”
r/TyreReviews
·6 upvotes ·2024-03-16
“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
r/croautomobili
·1 upvote ·2026-09-23
“Top top top guma, stavio prosle godine kad sam kupio auto, odmah na Kupres isao, snijega i leda bilo dosta, ali izdale me nisu Imam i ljetne hankook ventus prime 4 isto odlicna guma”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling
Based on 41 community posts
Tire B
Mixed
Kumho Ecowing ES31
The Kumho Ecowing ES31 is generally viewed as an affordable, budget-friendly mid-range summer tire that offers good durability and dry grip, making it popular among commuters and rideshare drivers. However, opinions are mixed regarding its wet weather performance, with some users reporting poor wet grip while others find it acceptable for cautious, everyday driving.
r/carros
·3 upvotes ·2024-07-22
“Kumho ecowing es31 é o melhor custo benefício, tem classificação B de consumo e C de aderência, eu já tive pneu da Kumho e gostei da aderência e é um pneu macio pra conforto. Continental Power Contact 2 tbm é uma boa opção. Eu não recomendo xbri, farroad, ling long, speedmax, pois tem durabilidade baixa.”
r/ArAutos
·2 upvotes ·2025-04-04
“Tengo las kumho ecowing es31 y ninguna queja, siempre respondieron bien aunque la verdad manejo como un abuelo, solo una vez frene fuerte en la panamericana y nunca bloquearon, las volveria a poner en otro auto.”
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2025-11-05
“The EU label is all over the place. But none have A-A-A as far as I can tell. Did not score good in wet in the test on the site. Wear rate on a Mazda 2 should be decent with almost anything. Why not look at all seasons? Sava All weather and Kumho Solus are closest to the ES31 in price.”
Top themes
#Cost effectiveness and value#Wet weather grip#Treadwear and durability#Budget tier limitations#Urban commuting suitability
Based on 12 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | B · Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 66 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| UTQG | 200 - 420 A A | — |
| Sizes in common | 10 | 10 |
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
63
/ 100
Kumho Ecowing ES31
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 72 vs 55 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 79 vs 64 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 77 vs 63 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 66 on treadwear.
Tire A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES31
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ventus Prime 4 or Ecowing ES31?
Which is better in the wet, Ventus Prime 4 or Ecowing ES31?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 77 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus Prime 4 or Ecowing ES31?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 79 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ventus Prime 4 or Ecowing ES31?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 69 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ventus Prime 4 or Ecowing ES31?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology