Nexen N FERA SUR4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 13 + 0 road tests and 2,504 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 77–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire AHankook

Ventus Prime 4

Summer

Tests 77 · 13 tests Owners 73 · 2,504 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”

Nexen N FERA SUR4
Tire BNexen

N FERA SUR4

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 80

    Dry

    Ventus Prime 4 +9
    71
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests84≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7673

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 83.7 + 40% × 75.6 = 80

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71

    No road tests of dry for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 78

    Wet

    Ventus Prime 4 +23
    55
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests80≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online7650

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 79.8 + 40% × 76.2 = 78

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 55

    No road tests of wet for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Comfort

    Ventus Prime 4 +10
    60
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7151

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 70.5 = 70

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for N FERA SUR4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 61

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests58–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 61

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 73

    Treadwear

    Ventus Prime 4 +18
    55
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests76≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6947

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 69 = 73

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus Prime 4 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4N FERA SUR4
    Reviews found online7471
Scores at a glance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Nexen N FERA SUR4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus Prime 4Nexen N FERA SUR4
Relative Score 77 62
Dry 80 71
Wet 78 55
Comfort 70 60
Noise 61 –
Treadwear 73 55
Handling (owners) 74 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ventus Prime 4

N FERA SUR4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus Prime 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
  • Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
  • Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
  • Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
  • Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 4 review

Tire B N FERA SUR4

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Precise steering feedback and predictable handling
  • Cost-effective alternative to more expensive track tires

Cons

  • High level of road noise
  • Poor wet-weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
  • Fast tread wear
All owner themes in the N FERA SUR4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Positive

Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.

Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling

Based on 41 community posts

Tire B

Nexen N FERA SUR4

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available66—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Nexen N FERA SUR4

Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N FERA SUR4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 78 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 73 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 70 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 80 vs 71 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus Prime 4 or N FERA SUR4?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus Prime 4 or N FERA SUR4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 78 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus Prime 4 or N FERA SUR4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 80 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus Prime 4 or N FERA SUR4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 70 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus Prime 4 or N FERA SUR4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 73 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology