Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Yokohama S.drive — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 1 road tests and 2,532 + 76 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 75–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire AHankook

Ventus Prime 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,532 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”

Yokohama S.drive
Tire BYokohama

S.drive

Summer

± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 57 · 76 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 79

    Dry

    Ventus Prime 4 +13
    66
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4S.drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests83≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7365

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73 = 79

    S.drive: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66

    No road tests of dry for S.drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Ventus Prime 4 +15
    62
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4S.drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests79≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7559

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.5 = 77

    S.drive: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62

    No road tests of wet for S.drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    50
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4S.drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online–36

    S.drive: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 36.3 = 50

    No road tests of snow for S.drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Ventus Prime 4 +9
    59
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4S.drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6755

    Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.3 = 68

    S.drive: 40% × 65.8 (est.) + 60% × 54.5 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for S.drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 61

    Noise

    S.drive +2
    63
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4S.drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests58≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)59

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 61

    S.drive: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 63

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for S.drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 74

    Treadwear

    Ventus Prime 4 +9
    65
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4S.drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 1 tests7970
    Reviews found online6758

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74

    S.drive: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 58.4 = 65

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus Prime 4 +9
    63
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4S.drive
    Reviews found online7263
  8. 84

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4S.drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests84–
Scores at a glance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Yokohama S.drive: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus Prime 4Yokohama S.drive
Relative Score 75 64
Dry 79 66
Wet 77 62
Snow – 50
Comfort 68 59
Noise 61 63
Treadwear 74 65
Handling (owners) 72 63
Efficiency 84 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Ventus Prime 4

± 7

S.drive

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryVentus Prime 4S.driveΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #11/16 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test #18/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus Prime 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
  • Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
  • Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
  • Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
  • Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 4 review

Tire B S.drive

Pros

  • Excellent dry grip and responsive handling
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway behavior in corners
  • Good overall tread longevity for a performance tire

Cons

  • Below-average or unsettling wet-weather traction
  • Noticeable road noise and tire roar on highways
  • Stiff, hard ride quality that can reduce comfort on rough roads
All owner themes in the S.drive review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Positive

Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.

Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling

Based on 41 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama S.drive

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 B · Yokohama S.drive
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available661
Rim diameters15″ – 20″17″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG200 - 420 A A300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Yokohama S.drive

Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better wet, dry and comfort. Where the Yokohama S.drive is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 77 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 79 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 68 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire B · Yokohama S.drive

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus Prime 4 or S.drive?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus Prime 4 or S.drive?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 77 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus Prime 4 or S.drive?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 79 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ventus Prime 4 or S.drive?

Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 63 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus Prime 4 or S.drive?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 68 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus Prime 4 or S.drive?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology