Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 73 · 2 reviews
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 vs Yokohama ADVAN A048 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 2 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus RS3 Z222 leads, 67–64 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 9 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
ADVAN A048 +173Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 ADVAN A048 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 67 ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 79 75 Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 67 + 40% × 79 = 72
ADVAN A048: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73
No road tests of dry for ADVAN A048. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
60
Wet
Ventus RS3 Z222 +159Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 ADVAN A048 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 52 ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 72 55 Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 51.9 + 40% × 71.8 = 60
ADVAN A048: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 59
No road tests of wet for ADVAN A048. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
67
Comfort
Ventus RS3 Z222 +661Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 ADVAN A048 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 65 53 Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 67
ADVAN A048: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Ventus RS3 Z222 or ADVAN A048. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison64Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 ADVAN A048 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 60 ADVAN A048: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64
No road tests of noise for ADVAN A048. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Ventus RS3 Z222 +1354Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 ADVAN A048 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 68 45 Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 67
ADVAN A048: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 45.3 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus RS3 Z222. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A048. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
77
Handling (owners)
Ventus RS3 Z222 +770Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 ADVAN A048 Reviews found online 77 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 | Yokohama ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 64 |
| Dry | 72 | 73 |
| Wet | 60 | 59 |
| Comfort | 67 | 61 |
| Noise | – | 64 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ventus RS3 Z222
ADVAN A048
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ventus RS3 Z222
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip with minimal warm-up time required
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
- Superior wet weather performance compared to typical semi-slick tires
Cons
- Limited suitability for snow or freezing conditions
- Performance is highly dependent on achieving optimal operating temperature
- Stiff sidewall construction may impact ride comfort for some users
Tire B ADVAN A048
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering adhesion
- High level of steering feedback and handling precision
- Progressive breakaway characteristics
Cons
- Rapid tread wear during track sessions
- High road noise levels
- Difficult to maintain optimal operating temperatures
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 | B · Yokohama ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222
Yokohama ADVAN A048
Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Where the Yokohama ADVAN A048 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 2 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama ADVAN A048 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 scores 67 vs 54 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 scores 77 vs 70 on handling.
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 scores 67 vs 61 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ventus RS3 Z222 or ADVAN A048?
Which is better in the wet, Ventus RS3 Z222 or ADVAN A048?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 59 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus RS3 Z222 or ADVAN A048?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Ventus RS3 Z222 or ADVAN A048?
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222, 67 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ventus RS3 Z222 or ADVAN A048?
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222, 67 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology