tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV vs Yokohama Advan V61 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 11 + 18 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Ventus S1 evo3 SUV and Advan V61 are level at 72.

Check price on Amazon · Ventus S1 evo3 SUV Check price on Amazon · Advan V61
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV
Tire AHankook

Ventus S1 evo3 SUV

Summer

± 5

Tests 76 · 3 tests Owners 69 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 10 in 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

Yokohama Advan V61
Tire BYokohama

Advan V61

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 18 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Ventus S1 evo3 SUV +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo3 SUVAdvan V61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests76≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7173

    Ventus S1 evo3 SUV: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 71.1 = 74

    Advan V61: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Advan V61. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Ventus S1 evo3 SUV +2
    75
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo3 SUVAdvan V61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests78≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7676

    Ventus S1 evo3 SUV: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 76.3 = 77

    Advan V61: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Advan V61. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 63

    Comfort

    Advan V61 +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo3 SUVAdvan V61
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6069

    Ventus S1 evo3 SUV: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.1 = 63

    Advan V61: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus S1 evo3 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

    No road tests of comfort for Advan V61. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  4. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo3 SUVAdvan V61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests70–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    Ventus S1 evo3 SUV: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo3 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 65

    Treadwear

    Advan V61 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo3 SUVAdvan V61
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6471

    Ventus S1 evo3 SUV: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 65

    Advan V61: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo3 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan V61. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Advan V61 +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo3 SUVAdvan V61
    Reviews found online6870
  7. 75

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo3 SUVAdvan V61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests75–
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUVYokohama Advan V61
Relative Score 72 72
Dry 74 71
Wet 77 75
Comfort 63 69
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 65 69
Handling (owners) 68 70
Efficiency 75 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Ventus S1 evo3 SUV

± 8

Advan V61

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus S1 evo3 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet handling grip
  • Comfortable ride quality and responsive steering
  • Good value for money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Notable road noise and cabin drone, especially at highway speeds or on rough surfaces
  • Below-average tread life and longevity for some users
  • Occasional reduction in wet braking confidence when pushed hard
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo3 SUV review

Tire B Advan V61

Pros

  • Good grip in dry and wet conditions, including heavy rain, and a more balanced, confident feel on the road
  • Reduced road noise and better comfort compared with OEM tires (Bridgestone HP Sport, Continental ContiPremiumContact)
  • Low rolling resistance, with one owner reporting fuel consumption falling from 5.3 to 4.9 L/100 km and another noting a small economy gain

Cons

  • Humming or low-frequency noise reported by some owners, particularly on coarse asphalt
  • Soft sidewall can feel slightly bumpy on uneven surfaces, especially at 36 PSI
  • Handling described as not sharp or sporty, with one reviewer noting they were not pushing limits
All owner themes in the Advan V61 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV B · Yokohama Advan V61
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available7919
Rim diameters17″ – 23″17″ – 22″
UTQG180 - 520 A - AA A—
Sizes in common1010

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV

Yokohama Advan V61

Too close to call: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV and Yokohama Advan V61 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV is stronger on dry. Yokohama Advan V61 is stronger on comfort and treadwear. Yokohama Advan V61 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 18 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan V61 scores 69 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Advan V61 scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV scores 74 vs 71 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Advan V61
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus S1 evo3 SUV or Advan V61?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus S1 evo3 SUV or Advan V61?

Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus S1 evo3 SUV or Advan V61?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV, 74 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus S1 evo3 SUV or Advan V61?

Yokohama Advan V61, 69 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus S1 evo3 SUV or Advan V61?

Yokohama Advan V61, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology