Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 18 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Yokohama Advan V61 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 18 + 2,532 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus Prime 4 leads, 76–72 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,532 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Ventus Prime 4 +879Why this score
Source Advan V61 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 73 73 Advan V61: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73 = 79
No road tests of dry for Advan V61. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
75
Wet
Ventus Prime 4 +277Why this score
Source Advan V61 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 76 75 Advan V61: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.5 = 77
No road tests of wet for Advan V61. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
Advan V61 +168Why this score
Source Advan V61 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 69 67 Advan V61: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.5 = 69
Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.3 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Advan V61. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
–
Noise
No comparison61Why this score
Source Advan V61 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 58 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
69
Treadwear
Ventus Prime 4 +574Why this score
Source Advan V61 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 71 67 Advan V61: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 69
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Advan V61. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
70
Handling (owners)
Ventus Prime 4 +272Why this score
Source Advan V61 Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 70 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison84Why this score
Source Advan V61 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests – 84
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan V61 | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 76 |
| Dry | 71 | 79 |
| Wet | 75 | 77 |
| Comfort | 69 | 68 |
| Noise | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Advan V61
76
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advan V61
Pros
- Good grip in dry and wet conditions, including heavy rain, and a more balanced, confident feel on the road
- Reduced road noise and better comfort compared with OEM tires (Bridgestone HP Sport, Continental ContiPremiumContact)
- Low rolling resistance, with one owner reporting fuel consumption falling from 5.3 to 4.9 L/100 km and another noting a small economy gain
Cons
- Humming or low-frequency noise reported by some owners, particularly on coarse asphalt
- Soft sidewall can feel slightly bumpy on uneven surfaces, especially at 36 PSI
- Handling described as not sharp or sporty, with one reviewer noting they were not pushing limits
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Yokohama Advan V61
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
r/AutomobileRO
·2 upvotes ·2025-03-23
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
forums.hardwarezone.com.sg
·3 upvotes ·2024-10-08
“Tried it out on 205/55R16 Grip wise, feels like similar grip level as previous Tyres. Quite good on dry, quick lane switch wun feel the Tyre wall lembeh over. Dry brake is good. Haven't test wet perf much yet. Noise, is abit similar to previous Tyre, maybe just slightly noiser. Comfort wise, is on the comfy side. FC wise, slightly worse than previous Tyre. Good replacement for economic call I feel from price per overall offering perspective Those who want a comfy n quiet ride, can consider this Tyre”
r/TireQuestions
·1 upvote ·2026-10-09
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and I found a cut/split. It’s holding air fine but it is cooked?”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling
Based on 41 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan V61 | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
| Sizes available | 19 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 - 420 A A |
| Sizes in common | 6 | 6 |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Yokohama Advan V61
76
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better dry and treadwear. Where the Yokohama Advan V61 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Yokohama Advan V61 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 18 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 79 vs 71 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 69 on treadwear.
Tire A · Yokohama Advan V61
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Advan V61 or Ventus Prime 4?
Which is better in the wet, Advan V61 or Ventus Prime 4?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 77 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Advan V61 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 79 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Advan V61 or Ventus Prime 4?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Advan V61 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology