Tests 72 · 5 tests Owners 67 · 4 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 2 road tests and 4 + 17 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Winter i*cept evo3 X and W.drive V905 are level at 69.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 5 tests Owners 67 · 4 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Tests 69 · 2 tests Owners 69 · 17 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 10 in 2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Winter i*cept evo3 X | W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests | 69 | 67 |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 71 |
Winter i*cept evo3 X: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 65.1 = 67
W.drive V905: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 71.1 = 69
| Source | Winter i*cept evo3 X | W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests | 81 | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 73 |
Winter i*cept evo3 X: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 70.7 = 77
W.drive V905: 60% × 73.9 + 40% × 73.4 = 74
| Source | Winter i*cept evo3 X | W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests | 81 | 72 |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 59 |
Winter i*cept evo3 X: 60% × 81.3 + 40% × 70.4 = 77
W.drive V905: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 58.8 = 67
| Source | Winter i*cept evo3 X | W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 53 | 64 |
Winter i*cept evo3 X: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 53 = 58
W.drive V905: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 63.7 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Winter i*cept evo3 X or W.drive V905. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Winter i*cept evo3 X | W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests | 23 | 63 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
Winter i*cept evo3 X: 60% × 22.9 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 40
W.drive V905: 60% × 62.9 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 64
No owner ratings of noise for Winter i*cept evo3 X or W.drive V905. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Winter i*cept evo3 X | W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 66 (est.) | 64 |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 73 |
Winter i*cept evo3 X: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 65
W.drive V905: 60% × 64 + 40% × 73.1 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Winter i*cept evo3 X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Winter i*cept evo3 X | W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 66 | 71 |
| Source | Winter i*cept evo3 X | W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests | 67 | 65 |
| Category | Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X | Yokohama W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 69 |
| Dry | 67 | 69 |
| Wet | 77 | 74 |
| Snow | 77 | 67 |
| Comfort | 58 | 65 |
| Noise | 40 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 71 |
| Efficiency | 67 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Winter i*cept evo3 X
W.drive V905
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Winter i*cept evo3 X | W.drive V905 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% #7/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 98% #5/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #7/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 98% #11/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 95% #5/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 91% #20/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 95% #2/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 93% #9/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #9/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 97% #9/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 93% #3/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 92% #14/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 99% #6/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 96% #16/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 97% #11/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 96% #18/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 90% #5/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 84% #18/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/11 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | #4/5 2022 Consumer Reports Performance Winter/Snow Tires | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X | B · Yokohama W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 72 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | — |
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X
Yokohama W.drive V905
Too close to call: Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X and Yokohama W.drive V905 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X is stronger on snow and wet. Yokohama W.drive V905 is stronger on noise, comfort and treadwear.
Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 64 vs 40 on noise.
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X scores 77 vs 67 on snow.
Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 65 vs 58 on comfort.
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X scores 77 vs 74 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X, 77 vs 74 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X, 77 vs 67 on our snow score.
Yokohama W.drive V905, 64 vs 40 on our noise score.
Yokohama W.drive V905, 65 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Yokohama W.drive V905, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology