Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 18 + 9 road tests and 23 + 61 owner reviews. How we score

Winter i cept evo3 is ahead, 78–72

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
± 4

Tests 76 · 18 tests Owners 82 · 23 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
Tire BNexen

WinGuard Sport 2

Winter

± 5

Tests 73 · 9 tests Owners 71 · 61 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 3 tests that measured wet braking for both, Winter i cept evo3 won 3 and WinGuard Sport 2 won 0 (average 94% vs 84% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured snow braking for both, Winter i cept evo3 won 3 and WinGuard Sport 2 won 0 (average 97% vs 94% of the best).
  1. 78

    Dry

    Winter i cept evo3 +8
    70
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3WinGuard Sport 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 6 tests7571
    Reviews found online8369
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–094%94%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%99%

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 82.7 = 78

    WinGuard Sport 2: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 69.4 = 70

  2. 90

    Wet

    Winter i cept evo3 +15
    75
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3WinGuard Sport 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 9 tests9273
    Reviews found online8677
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%97%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–094%84%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%97%

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 91.9 + 40% × 86.3 = 90

    WinGuard Sport 2: 60% × 73.5 + 40% × 77.4 = 75

  3. 80

    Snow

    Winter i cept evo3 +10
    70
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3WinGuard Sport 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 9 tests8170
    Reviews found online8070
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–097%94%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%92%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–094%87%

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 80.2 = 80

    WinGuard Sport 2: 60% × 70.5 + 40% × 69.6 = 70

  4. 73

    Comfort

    Winter i cept evo3 +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3WinGuard Sport 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests7264
    Reviews found online7471

    Winter i cept evo3: 40% × 71.8 + 60% × 74 = 73

    WinGuard Sport 2: 40% × 64.4 + 60% × 70.6 = 68

  5. 33

    Noise

    WinGuard Sport 2 +48
    81
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3WinGuard Sport 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 6 tests1094
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)61
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–197%100%

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 10 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 33

    WinGuard Sport 2: 60% × 94.3 + 40% × 61.3 = 81

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 79

    Treadwear

    Winter i cept evo3 +6
    73
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3WinGuard Sport 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 2 tests7775
    Reviews found online8171

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 77 + 40% × 81 = 79

    WinGuard Sport 2: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 71.3 = 73

  7. 82

    Handling (owners)

    Winter i cept evo3 +12
    70
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3WinGuard Sport 2
    Reviews found online8270
  8. 62

    Efficiency

    Winter i cept evo3 +28
    34
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3WinGuard Sport 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 6 tests6234
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–091%90%
Scores at a glance
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Nexen WinGuard Sport 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Winter i cept evo3Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
Relative Score 78 72
Dry 78 70
Wet 90 75
Snow 80 70
Comfort 73 68
Noise 33 81
Treadwear 79 73
Handling (owners) 82 70
Efficiency 62 34

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Winter i cept evo3

± 5

WinGuard Sport 2

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Hankook Winter i cept evo3 finished ahead 3 times and Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryWinter i cept evo3WinGuard Sport 2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 94% 94% +0.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Dry Handling Dry 98% 99% −0.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 100% 97% +2.8 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Wet Braking Wet 94% 84% +9.8 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test · 225/45 R18
Wet Handling Wet 99% 97% +1.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Snow Braking Snow 97% 94% +2.6 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test · 225/45 R18
Snow Handling Snow 100% 92% +7.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Snow Traction Snow 94% 87% +7.5 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Noise Noise 97% 100% −3.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 91% 90% +1.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 87% 100% −13.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Overall Ranking Overall #8/54 #27/54 – 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test · 225/45 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Winter i cept evo3

Pros

  • Exceptional wet grip and outstanding aquaplaning resistance
  • Outstanding snow and ice traction providing high confidence in winter storms
  • Great value for money compared to Tier-1 brands like Michelin or Goodyear

Cons

  • Slightly increased noise levels or humming compared to summer tires
  • Mixed feedback on ride comfort, with some finding them stiffer
  • Longer braking distances reported by a few users in specific conditions
All owner themes in the Winter i cept evo3 review

Tire B WinGuard Sport 2

Pros

  • Excellent value and affordable price point compared to premium winter tires
  • Low noise levels and high comfort, often rivaling all-season or summer tires
  • Strong grip and stability on cold dry and wet pavement

Cons

  • Subpar performance on hard-packed ice and deep snow compared to dedicated heavy-duty winter tires
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to slightly vague handling or a 'rolly' feeling in hard cornering
  • Reports of higher rolling resistance resulting in a minor drop in fuel economy
All owner themes in the WinGuard Sport 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Winter i cept evo3 B · Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available8680
Rim diameters17″ – 22″15″ – 20″
Tread depth—11/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common4141

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Nexen WinGuard Sport 2

Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — better efficiency, wet and handling. Pick the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 scores 81 vs 33 on noise.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 62 vs 34 on efficiency.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 90 vs 75 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 82 vs 70 on handling.

Tire A · Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Tire B · Nexen WinGuard Sport 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Winter i cept evo3 or WinGuard Sport 2?

Which is better in the wet, Winter i cept evo3 or WinGuard Sport 2?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 90 vs 75 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Winter i cept evo3 or WinGuard Sport 2?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 78 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Winter i cept evo3 or WinGuard Sport 2?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 80 vs 70 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Winter i cept evo3 or WinGuard Sport 2?

Nexen WinGuard Sport 2, 81 vs 33 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Winter i cept evo3 or WinGuard Sport 2?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 73 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Winter i cept evo3 or WinGuard Sport 2?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 79 vs 73 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Winter i cept evo3 or WinGuard Sport 2?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 62 vs 34 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology