Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 17 + 10 road tests and 22 + 66 owner reviews. How we score

Winter i cept evo3 is ahead, 78–73

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
± 4

Tests 76 · 17 tests Owners 82 · 22 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
± 6

Tests 67 · 10 tests Owners 81 · 66 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 78

    Dry

    Winter i cept evo3 +1
    77
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Winter Sottozero 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 8 tests7573
    Reviews found online8282
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–195%96%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%99%

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 81.9 = 78

    Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 81.9 = 77

  2. 90

    Wet

    Winter i cept evo3 +7
    83
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Winter Sottozero 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 10 tests9280
    Reviews found online8687
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–097%94%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–094%86%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%95%

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 92.1 + 40% × 86.2 = 90

    Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 87.1 = 83

  3. 80

    Snow

    Winter i cept evo3 +15
    65
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Winter Sottozero 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 10 tests8056
    Reviews found online8079
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–097%94%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%97%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–093%91%

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 80.1 + 40% × 79.5 = 80

    Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 56.3 + 40% × 78.5 = 65

  4. 73

    Comfort

    Winter Sottozero 3 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Winter Sottozero 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests7272
    Reviews found online7476

    Winter i cept evo3: 40% × 71.6 + 60% × 73.7 = 73

    Winter Sottozero 3: 40% × 72.2 + 60% × 75.7 = 74

  5. 33

    Noise

    Winter Sottozero 3 +38
    71
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Winter Sottozero 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 7 tests1064
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)82
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–194%97%

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 10 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 33

    Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 64.4 + 40% × 81.6 = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 79

    Treadwear

    Winter i cept evo3 +15
    64
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Winter Sottozero 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 3 tests7757
    Reviews found online8175
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–083%83%

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 77 + 40% × 81.1 = 79

    Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 57.1 + 40% × 74.9 = 64

  7. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Winter Sottozero 3 +2
    83
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Winter Sottozero 3
    Reviews found online8183
  8. 62

    Efficiency

    Winter Sottozero 3 +14
    76
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Winter Sottozero 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 7 tests6276
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–181%100%
Scores at a glance
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Winter i cept evo3Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Relative Score 78 73
Dry 78 77
Wet 90 83
Snow 80 65
Comfort 73 74
Noise 33 71
Treadwear 79 64
Handling (owners) 81 83
Efficiency 62 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Winter i cept evo3

± 6

Winter Sottozero 3

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Hankook Winter i cept evo3 finished ahead 2 times and Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryWinter i cept evo3Winter Sottozero 3ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% 96% −0.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Dry Handling Dry 100% 99% +0.5 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% 94% +2.8 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Wet Braking Wet 94% 86% +7.7 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test · 245/45 R18
Wet Handling Wet 98% 95% +3.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Snow Braking Snow 97% 94% +3.0 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test · 245/45 R18
Snow Handling Snow 98% 97% +0.5 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Snow Traction Snow 93% 91% +2.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Noise Noise 94% 97% −3.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Wear Treadwear 83% 83% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 81% 100% −19.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #18/20 #5/20 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Value Cost 78% 64% +13.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Overall Ranking Overall #5/48 #20/48 – 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test · 245/45 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Winter i cept evo3

Pros

  • Exceptional wet grip and outstanding aquaplaning resistance
  • Outstanding snow and ice traction providing high confidence in winter storms
  • Great value for money compared to Tier-1 brands like Michelin or Goodyear

Cons

  • Slightly increased noise levels or humming compared to summer tires
  • Mixed feedback on ride comfort, with some finding them stiffer
  • Longer braking distances reported by a few users in specific conditions
All owner themes in the Winter i cept evo3 review

Tire B Winter Sottozero 3

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance and resistance to hydroplaning.
  • Strong dry-road handling and steering precision for a winter tire.
  • Excellent traction and stability in snow and slush.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, particularly if driven in temperatures above 15°C or year-round.
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage and bubbling when encountering road hazards.
  • Increased noise levels as the tire ages and tread depth decreases.
All owner themes in the Winter Sottozero 3 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Winter i cept evo3 B · Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available8698
Rim diameters17″ – 22″16″ – 21″
Tread depth—10/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common5757

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — better snow, treadwear and wet. Pick the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 if noise and efficiency matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 71 vs 33 on noise.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 80 vs 65 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 79 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 76 vs 62 on efficiency.

Tire A · Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Tire B · Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Winter i cept evo3 or Winter Sottozero 3?

Which is better in the wet, Winter i cept evo3 or Winter Sottozero 3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 90 vs 83 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Winter i cept evo3 or Winter Sottozero 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 78 vs 77 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Winter i cept evo3 or Winter Sottozero 3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 80 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Winter i cept evo3 or Winter Sottozero 3?

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 71 vs 33 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Winter i cept evo3 or Winter Sottozero 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Winter i cept evo3 or Winter Sottozero 3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 79 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Winter i cept evo3 or Winter Sottozero 3?

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 76 vs 62 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology