Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 vs Nexen WinGuard SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 7 + 0 road tests and 50 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Winter i*cept RS2 is ahead, 76–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2
Tire AHankook

Winter i*cept RS2

Winter

± 5

Tests 78 · 7 tests Owners 74 · 50 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (wet handling)

Nexen WinGuard SUV
Tire BNexen

WinGuard SUV

Winter Touring tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Winter i*cept RS2 +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*cept RS2WinGuard SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests75≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7265

    Winter i*cept RS2: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 72.4 = 74

    WinGuard SUV: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66

    No road tests of dry for WinGuard SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 85

    Wet

    Winter i*cept RS2 +17
    68
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*cept RS2WinGuard SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests90≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7967

    Winter i*cept RS2: 60% × 89.8 + 40% × 78.5 = 85

    WinGuard SUV: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of wet for WinGuard SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 77

    Snow

    Winter i*cept RS2 +10
    67
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*cept RS2WinGuard SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests81≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7164

    Winter i*cept RS2: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 71.4 = 77

    WinGuard SUV: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 67

    No road tests of snow for WinGuard SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    Winter i*cept RS2 +9
    62
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*cept RS2WinGuard SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests75≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6858

    Winter i*cept RS2: 40% × 75.2 + 60% × 67.7 = 71

    WinGuard SUV: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for WinGuard SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 60

    Noise

    WinGuard SUV +6
    66
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*cept RS2WinGuard SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests56≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)66

    Winter i*cept RS2: 60% × 56.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 60

    WinGuard SUV: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 66

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter i*cept RS2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for WinGuard SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    Winter i*cept RS2 +10
    65
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*cept RS2WinGuard SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests74≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7664

    Winter i*cept RS2: 60% × 74.5 + 40% × 75.8 = 75

    WinGuard SUV: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for WinGuard SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Winter i*cept RS2 +17
    57
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*cept RS2WinGuard SUV
    Reviews found online7457
  8. 42

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*cept RS2WinGuard SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests42–
Scores at a glance
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 vs Nexen WinGuard SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Winter i*cept RS2Nexen WinGuard SUV
Relative Score 76 66
Dry 74 66
Wet 85 68
Snow 77 67
Comfort 71 62
Noise 60 66
Treadwear 75 65
Handling (owners) 74 57
Efficiency 42 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Winter i*cept RS2

± 8

WinGuard SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryWinter i*cept RS2WinGuard SUVΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/49 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview #9/9 2014 Autobild SUV / 4x4 Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Winter i*cept RS2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and handling on wet and dry roads
  • Impressive resistance to aquaplaning in heavy rain or standing water
  • Strong value for money with a competitive price point

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise, especially at highway speeds
  • Firm, stiff sidewalls leading to a less comfortable or harsh ride
  • Subpar performance and unpredictable grip on ice and black ice
All owner themes in the Winter i*cept RS2 review

Tire B WinGuard SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in hard winter conditions, snow, and ice
  • Confident handling and performance when towing heavy loads up steep hills
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on the road

Cons

  • Limited long-term mileage data available from reviewers, as many users drive low annual miles
  • Availability in certain niche tire sizes may be limited
All owner themes in the WinGuard SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 B · Nexen WinGuard SUV
CategoryWinterWinter Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available3725
Rim diameters13″ – 17″15″ – 19″
Tread depth—13/32″
Treadwear warranty—30,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2

Nexen WinGuard SUV

Winner: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 — better wet, handling and snow. Pick the Nexen WinGuard SUV if noise matters most to you. Nexen WinGuard SUV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 scores 85 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 scores 74 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 scores 77 vs 67 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 scores 75 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · Hankook Winter i*cept RS2
Tire B · Nexen WinGuard SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Winter i*cept RS2 or WinGuard SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Winter i*cept RS2 or WinGuard SUV?

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2, 85 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Winter i*cept RS2 or WinGuard SUV?

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Winter i*cept RS2 or WinGuard SUV?

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2, 77 vs 67 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Winter i*cept RS2 or WinGuard SUV?

Nexen WinGuard SUV, 66 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Winter i*cept RS2 or WinGuard SUV?

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2, 71 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Winter i*cept RS2 or WinGuard SUV?

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2, 75 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology