Tests 77 · 8 tests Owners 75 · 25 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Head-to-head
Updated
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 8 + 21 road tests and 25 + 1,244 owner reviews. How we score
Dynaxer HP4 leads, 75–72 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,244 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
Key facts
- In 7 tests that measured dry braking for both, Dynaxer HP4 won 3 and ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 4 (average 96% vs 97% of the best).
- In 7 tests that measured wet braking for both, Dynaxer HP4 won 0 and ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 7 (average 91% vs 95% of the best).
- In 4 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, Dynaxer HP4 won 1 and ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 3 (average 95% vs 96% of the best).
- In 4 tests that measured wear for both, Dynaxer HP4 won 1 and ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 3 (average 64% vs 64% of the best).
- In 3 tests that measured dry handling for both, Dynaxer HP4 won 0 and ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 3 (average 98% vs 100% of the best).
-
77
Dry
Dynaxer HP4 +374Why this score
Source Dynaxer HP4 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 20 tests 78 79 Reviews found online 75 66 Dry Braking (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 3–4 96% 97% Dry Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–3 98% 100% Dynaxer HP4: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 75.4 = 77
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.5 + 40% × 66.4 = 74
-
79
Wet
Level79Why this score
Source Dynaxer HP4 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 20 tests 80 85 Reviews found online 79 70 Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 87% 93% Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 1–3 95% 96% Wet Braking (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 0–7 91% 95% Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 89% 98% Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 88% 98% Wet Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 96% 98% Dynaxer HP4: 60% × 79.9 + 40% × 78.6 = 79
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 69.5 = 79
-
73
Comfort
Dynaxer HP4 +1261Why this score
Source Dynaxer HP4 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 60 Reviews found online 75 62 Dynaxer HP4: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 74.8 = 73
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60 + 60% × 62.3 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Dynaxer HP4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
78
Noise
Dynaxer HP4 +1266Why this score
Source Dynaxer HP4 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 14 tests 85 66 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Noise (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 99% 98% Dynaxer HP4: 60% × 85.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 78
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 66
No owner ratings of noise for Dynaxer HP4 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
71
Treadwear
Dynaxer HP4 +269Why this score
Source Dynaxer HP4 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 6 tests 72 72 Reviews found online 71 63 Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 55% 46% Wear (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 1–3 64% 64% Dynaxer HP4: 60% × 71.8 + 40% × 71 = 71
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.3 + 40% × 63.2 = 69
-
70
Handling (owners)
Dynaxer HP4 +466Why this score
Source Dynaxer HP4 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Reviews found online 70 66 -
74
Efficiency
Dynaxer HP4 +4331Why this score
Source Dynaxer HP4 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 15 tests 74 31 Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 97% 93% Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 83% 77%
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 72 |
| Dry | 77 | 74 |
| Wet | 79 | 79 |
| Comfort | 73 | 61 |
| Noise | 78 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 66 |
| Efficiency | 74 | 31 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Dynaxer HP4
72
/ 100
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 7 tests that ran both, Kleber Dynaxer HP4 finished ahead 0 times and Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 7 times.
| Discipline | Category | Dynaxer HP4 | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% | 97% | −0.8 | 3–4 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 205/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% | 100% | −1.2 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 87% | 93% | −6.4 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 95% | 96% | −1.0 | 1–3 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% | 95% | −3.9 | 0–7 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Braking (concrete) | Wet | 89% | 98% | −9.2 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 88% | 98% | −10.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% | 98% | −1.1 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Noise | Noise | 99% | 98% | +1.5 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 55% | 46% | +8.8 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 64% | 64% | −0.5 | 1–3 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Fuel Consumption | Efficiency | 97% | 93% | +3.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 83% | 77% | +6.4 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #10/20 | #13/20 | – | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Value | Cost | 69% | 70% | −0.4 | 1–2 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #15/55 | #7/55 | – | 0–7 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 205/55 R16 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynaxer HP4
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price point
- Very low noise levels and high ride comfort
- Strong grip and confident braking on both dry and wet roads
Cons
- Some reports of rapid aging, cracking, or surface degradation over time
- Sidewalls can be sensitive to potholes, curb chafing, and bubbling
- Occasional complaints of wet-weather handling declining at higher speeds or later in the tire's lifespan
Tire B ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
- Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency
Based on 5 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 45 | 86 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 17″ | 14″ – 19″ |
| Sizes in common | 36 | 36 |
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
72
/ 100
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Narrow edge: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 — better efficiency, comfort and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want lower fuel or energy use
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 scores 74 vs 31 on efficiency.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 scores 73 vs 61 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 scores 78 vs 66 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 scores 77 vs 74 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet braking
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 7 of 7 shared wet braking tests.
Tire A · Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Tire B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynaxer HP4 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Which is better in the wet, Dynaxer HP4 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 79 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynaxer HP4 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Kleber Dynaxer HP4, 77 vs 74 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Dynaxer HP4 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Kleber Dynaxer HP4, 78 vs 66 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynaxer HP4 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Kleber Dynaxer HP4, 73 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynaxer HP4 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Which rolls more easily, Dynaxer HP4 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Kleber Dynaxer HP4, 74 vs 31 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology