Tests – · none yet Owners 35 · 275 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Michelin Premier LTX — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 275 + 2 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners – · 2 reviews (needs 5)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
44
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Premier LTX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 53 (est.) – Reviews found online 32 – Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.8 (est.) + 40% × 31.8 = 44
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
52
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Premier LTX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) – Reviews found online 45 – Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 52
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Premier LTX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) – Reviews found online 42 – Crugen HP71: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 41.9 = 53
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
45
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Premier LTX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) – Reviews found online 33 – Crugen HP71: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 33.4 = 45
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
55
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Premier LTX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 37 – Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 36.7 = 55
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
37
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Premier LTX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 49 (est.) – Reviews found online 18 – Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.5 (est.) + 40% × 18.3 = 37
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
52
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Premier LTX Reviews found online 52 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Michelin Premier LTX |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 48 | – |
| Dry | 44 | – |
| Wet | 52 | – |
| Snow | 53 | – |
| Comfort | 45 | – |
| Noise | 55 | – |
| Treadwear | 37 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 52 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
48
/ 100
Crugen HP71
–
/ 100
Premier LTX
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Crugen HP71
Pros
- Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
- Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
- Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
- Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
- Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
Tire B Premier LTX
Pros
- High levels of overall performance and handling
- Strong brand reputation for quality and engineering
- Comfortable and refined ride characteristics
Cons
- Insufficient initial tread depth
- Concerns regarding premature tread wear
- Perceived lack of value due to limited lifespan
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community sentiment for the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is mixed, with owners praising its affordability, comfortable ride, and quiet performance on many vehicles. However, a significant number of drivers report disappointingly rapid tread wear—particularly on heavy electric vehicles—as well as occasional noise on coarse surfaces and internal acoustic foam detachment issues.
r/Ioniq5
·1 upvote ·2026-08-30
“The HP71 are actually the OE tire for several trim/MY combinations for the Ioniq 5 and EV6 and they're decent tires. The longest lasting tire is the Defender 2, with the trade off of mediocre traction. I run the Nokian One because it's a batter balance of traction and tread wear than the defender but still quiet and very long-lasting.”
r/CadillacLyriq
·4 upvotes ·2026-09-20
“How many miles do you guys get on tires? I had a blowout back in June, and decided to just buy a full set. The shop had a promo on these KumHo Crugen HP71 tires, which had a 65,000 mile warranty. 3 months and 12,000 miles later, my tread is completely gone. I got some Michelins and was credited 185 bucks per tire, but this seems insanely low mileage to wear out the tread completely. I know the added weight and torque of an EV somewhat lowers the lifespan of tires, but even if I was driving like a demon, I don't think 12,000 miles should be anywhere near the lifespan of a reputable brand.”
r/MechanicAdvice
·2 upvotes ·2019-07-17
“Kumho HP71 vs Continental DWS06 I was planning to get Continentals for $150 each, but then I found these Kumhos for $118 each. The Continentals have a treadwear of 560, whereas the Kumhos have a treadwear of 640. They both have A/A for traction/temp. Is it really worth the extra $128 for brand name if the cheaper ones will outlast them?”
Top themes
#Rapid tread wear#Affordable price value#Cabin noise levels#Ride comfort#EV tire performance#Acoustic foam issues#OEM tire replacement
Based on 51 community posts
Tire B
Michelin Premier LTX
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Michelin Premier LTX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 63 | 2 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 18″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
48
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
–
/ 100
Michelin Premier LTX
Only Kumho Crugen HP71 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire B · Michelin Premier LTX
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology