Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AKumho

Ecsta 4X KU22

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 1 review

Tire BHankook

Ventus S1 evo3

Summer

Tests 76 · 19 tests Owners 59 · 3,355 reviews

“Small tire size change having different ratings? (Hankook Ventus S1 Evo3) Hi all, I'm looking for a good all round tire for my MX5 (I'm in the non snowy regions of the UK so summer tires) and a pretty popular recommendation are the Ventus S1 Evo 3s. At the MX5's stock size of 205/45/R17 they are rated at A for fuel and wet performance, and 68db of noise, which is great! However I'd like to size up to 215/45/R17, and for whatever reason the ratings drop to B for fuel and wet performance, and most importantly to me, 71db of noise. I was just wondering how such a small difference in size changes things quite drastically? I know these ratings aren't that important, but it seems strange to me they'd change at all Thanks! Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 4X KU22Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score)–84
    Reviews found online–63
  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    81
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 4X KU22Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score)–88
    Reviews found online–69
  3. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 4X KU22Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score)–65
    Reviews found online–59
  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 4X KU22Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score)–74
  5. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 4X KU22Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score)–61
    Reviews found online–46
  6. –

    Handling

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 4X KU22Ventus S1 evo3
    Reviews found online–60
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta 4X KU22Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Relative Score – 69
Dry – 76
Wet – 81
Comfort – 62
Noise – 71
Treadwear – 55
Handling – 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecsta 4X KU22

Ventus S1 evo3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta 4X KU22

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Ventus S1 evo3

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet and dry conditions
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Competitive pricing compared to premium tier-one brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on rear axles or heavy vehicles
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced steering feedback and precision
  • Vulnerability to sidewall damage or bubbling from potholes
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

Mixed

Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Road noise levels#Tread wear and longevity#OEM fitments and EV variants#Run-flat identification confusion#Ride comfort

Based on 33 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1110
Rim diameters18″17″ – 22″

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

Only Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.