Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 9 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS vs Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 1 review
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Ecsta 4X KU22 Reviews found online 67 – -
68
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Ecsta 4X KU22 Reviews found online 67 – -
56
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Ecsta 4X KU22 Reviews found online 47 – -
62
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Ecsta 4X KU22 Reviews found online 54 – -
64
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Ecsta 4X KU22 Reviews found online 60 – -
60
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Ecsta 4X KU22 Reviews found online 56 – -
61
Handling
No comparison–Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Ecsta 4X KU22 Reviews found online 61 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS | Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | – |
| Dry | 67 | – |
| Wet | 68 | – |
| Snow | 56 | – |
| Comfort | 62 | – |
| Noise | 64 | – |
| Treadwear | 60 | – |
| Handling | 61 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE980AS
Ecsta 4X KU22
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE980AS
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and sporty handling characteristics
- Sharp and responsive initial turn-in
- Competitive pricing within the premium high-performance category
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tread wears down
- Poor snow and ice traction compared to other all-season options
- Stiffer sidewall impact comfort relative to competitors like Michelin
Tire B Ecsta 4X KU22
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS | B · Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 500 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS
Kumho Ecsta 4X KU22
Only Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.